Now be bold. Throw a little obamacare into the mix, why not . We expect to see some action this afternoon in the Senate Finance committee as members work on their tax package, supporters are noting there is nonpartisan analysis saying the middle class would benefit from their tax package. To Mitch Mcconnells point, every group gets tax relief here. The differences that the burden of Taxation Shifts so that those at the top and are going to pay a little bit more of the burden and those in the middle class are going to pay less of the burden. Bob corker of tennessee, jeff flake of arizona have expressed concerns about the nations debt. G. O. P. Leaders will need to assure them that this tax package wont blow a hole in the deficit. Some key republicans a tax reform would bring in more revenue by bringing jobs and investment back to the u. S. Meanwhile, democrats are taking aim. Ive never seen a more blatant attempt at a corporate welfare bill than this bill. They are literally taking mone
The Danville Pittsylvania County Chamber of Commerce asked the public to submit questions for candidates running for seats on the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors.
would frown on the efforts to undo birthright citizenship. i m one of them. neil: how do you think the latino vote is shaping up for 24? look, i think there s a tremendous opportunity. there haven about shifting winds where republicans have been picking up latino voters left and right, and latinos are distancing themselves away from sort of the radical agenda of the left. the focus with latinos should be on championing a pro growth, pro jobs, pro energy agenda, end of washington s wasteful spending, secure our borders, tackle the runaway crime in our urban centers, defend our constitution. these are all things you can focus on and win latino voters on and especially, i think, a full-throated defense of the free market, especially when it comes to like attracting these young, urban college educated latina women a big part of the
was already spent and adhered to be spend. and trying to hold everything accountable to that, even risking government shut down and worse. how did it get this wacky? well, i don t know how it got this wacky here. but what ronald reagan did in his full term, he reduced nongovernment spending, facially substantial as the gdp and increased defense spending dramatically. the spending types were different between now and then. today spending is paying people not to work, giving them gifts. it s a different type of spending. the consequences are very different. reagan had this bull market that started january 1, 1983 that would not stop with government spending, higher on defense but coming down elsewhere. tax cuts, pro growth. this administration is the exact opposite. they re trying to do tax increases, spending increases, under sound money. it s not working.