argument, for the opponents, had to be hearing that fall on deaf ears. they had to hope they would hear the chief justice make an assertion that the integrity of the court matters. they get no principaled conversation with them. it is a watershed case like this. it falls on deaf ears because is let s let the people decide. yeah, just caution, but don t know whether or not it fell on deaf ears with the chief, but he is so concerned about propriety, he must have cringed, i have seen them do it once, but i
or vaccines but the instruction by republican governors to tell school districts that they cannot take steps for safety such as masking or telling businesses that they cannot require masks. it s entirely inconsistent and really a lot of this seems to be rather performative about trying to appeal to the republican base and not about what is in the best health interest of the citizens of these individual states. you can make a constitutional argument, a principaled argument that you don t think under the commerce clause that the president has the right to do this or that it s over steps osha s regulatory authority and that s fine. courtrooms will hear the arguments but beyond that is the idea of what are you as a leader doing to try to end the pandemic? quite frankly, there are exceptions to this but there are a lot of governors, republican
apply kicants for the program. that s the 20,000 principaled applicants and their eligible family members. each applicant has brought 4.4 people with them. a spouse and children. if you do the math, 20,000 applicants trying a historical average of 4.4 people is 88,000 people. that s how many people were tracking the day the evacuation began. what s terrifying is the defense department says they can only account for 7,000 of those 88,000 people as having been evacuated. matt, we have also heard there are 100 plus americans who were still there after the planes took off. what is what s next? what happens? how will the u.s. we heard they will get them out through diplomatic means. what does that mean to you? it continues this fantasy
actually infrastructure, mr. speaker, and the tax foundation said it is not even 1.2 trillion. it is 2 trillion. then they are coming behind with 3.5 trillion with a massive welfare state expansion. that s not 3.5 trillion, that s 5.5 trillion. you want to contribute to turning this country into the [inaudible] republic? republicans, mr. speaker, they stood up against slavery. they have taken positions that are principaled, that are right. i just don t see it. i do agree with you. i see it in the house. i don t see a lot of it in the senate. we will be right back.
trace: rita glavin is apparently frozen. we ll bring her back on when she starts speaking. she says she knows the difference between putting together a case and doing open-minded fact finding. there was no open-minded fact finding. what do you think so far? she should have done her homework. if she knew ann clark like i know and litigated against her for decades, she would know this is a stand-up principaled extraordinary lawyer that went do anything inappropriate. it s offensive. she should have done her homework. i don t know the other investigator. i can only assume that he s equally principaled and an upstanding lawyer. they were tasked with doing an investigation. how this individual that can