overwhelming evidence of the need for this government, sba. then it s a debatable issue. the government i don t think came close after judge o connor justifies presumptively. fancy word, it is unconstitutional until the government proofs otherwise. yeah. ken starr, thank you for being here. appreciate it. david: russian president vladimir putin denying knowledge of the russian group that attacked the colonial pipeline. president biden is buying that. should you? (vo) ideas exist inside you, electrify you. they grow from our imagination, but they can t be held back.
professors that discusses what they consider to be a legitimate impeachment process. the book is pretty anti-trump. it s called to end a presidency. in that book the authors state the following, when an impeachment is purely partisan or appears that way, it is presumptive presumptively there s a strong risk that policy disagreements have overtaken the proper measure of we can also expect that opposition leaders to the president will be pushed to impeach. the key question is whether they will cave to this pressure. one risk of our broken politics is that the house will undertake additional doomed partisan impeachments, a development that would be disastrous for the nation as a whole. is that advice being followed by house democrats in this case? not on this schedule. i laid out the three impeachments. the one thing that comes out of
accomplish, in a way where they can think about what he s going to say before he says it and make the case, he would be his own best advocate. i think that would be a good idea. the idea of sitting and reading the transcripts, i don t think that s helpful. to give an address in the oval office melissa: he would have to not ad lib, though. harris: i don t agree with that. i think reading the transcript would be interesting to see. andy: oh, i agree with that. [laughs] harris: no, i mean interesting to see the substance that the president would hit back on and add to. i don t see much difference between those two things. i do agree with melissa that there has to be discipline there for him to stick to the script and to explain why, in fact and then we can really understand why, in fact, he calls it a perfect call or whatever he has said. he may say, you know what? when you get to this part, maybe you have questions about that. let me answer it. to me, he is his own best mar
communications between secretary clinton and president obama. i don t know about chains of conviction are individual or discrete communications. at the time when this came up, what my recollection is is that they invoked the presidential records act to seal it. my complaint at the time and it s still my complaint i think they were classified communications. by invoking the presidential communications act, it was a way of concealing them without having to discuss that they leaked customer information. katie: is that why the doj is not producing them? andy: certainly president obama would say so, and secretary clinton would have been one of his key advisors. those kind of communications are presumptively melissa: why do we care about this? do you think there s something in the email, or just proving that the conversation? katie: of the context of
america isn t easy. america is advanced citizenship. you got to want it bad. remember when michael douglas said that? book because it s going to put up a fight. it s going to say, you want free speech? lets you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who is standing center stage in advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing of the top of yours. you want to claim this land as the land of the free? been the symbol of your country can be a flag. i think he says bob. [laughter] the symbol has been one of its citizens, exercising his right to bring that flag in protest. show me that predefend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. then you can stand up and sing with the land of the free. you re 5 minutes of fame are up to maker 15 can make is that it went? it was a really good movie. what does he do the year andy: he depressed me by telling me that movie was more than 20 years old. [laughter] melissa: so chu! andy: you re kil