free market works. he s not peddling influence and power.ke he did not create the obama foundation to take t $25 million he s doing it transparently, taking $400,000 a pop so people can listen to him spin a boring yarn about his time in office. hey, it works both ways. they are getting something, he s getting something. that is capitalism. juan: he still exercises influence. tremendous influence, especially in democratic party politics. i wonder if the left is going to be upset with him. kimberly: what about the wall street money? w juan: one more thing coming right at you. stay with us. us.
of anger. dana: we will just encourage. kennedy: there already is the implosion of obamacare. it is heartless and cruel to keep this. juan: you can t say that to more than 50% of americans who support obamacare. dana: we will continue to talk about this over the course of the week. go online and see how you feel about both sides. president obama is going to cash in on wall street, of all places. stay tuned.
used as justification to the judge, the fake trump dossier which has been widely discredited and used and manufactured by that democratic attack machine and allegedly also paid for by the fbi. the fbi has not been forthcoming about how it obtained that dossier. james clapper, obama s intelligence guy said that there was no wiretapping of any trump people in trump tower. james comey said no wiretapping, not during the campaign. either someone is lying or the story is fake news. i don t think we know yet. juan: can i just bash my head on the table? jesse: please! please do! juan: that s a whopper what you just said. let me get this straight. jesse: i was quoting cnn s report. juan: vindication?
jesse: he owns the apartment, right? kennedy: why are we getting caught up in this 1950s lingo? you don t necessarily need wires in order to get all the information and conversations that you want. you can do that digitally and electronically. juan: there was no authorization from obama and no political motivation. kennedy: let s say that a fisa judge gave intelligence the intelligence apparatus the freedom to go ahead and gather some of that information. which could have been emails, phone conversations, cell phone conversations. you don t need wires to tap in. juan: but it was paul manafort. not donald trump. dana: this is all missing the point. america deserves more information about why a presidential campaign of the party out of power was being surveilled. i do think the point is that manafort never should have taken the job in the first place. this goes back to 2014.
cultures, necessarily although some people might want to take it that way. it was something to be said about europe and the migrant crisis. and what he thinks is the destruction of some of those cultures as we saw in the warsaw speech. all in all, i thought it was great. i also will just say i thought it was the most clear shot against socialism. kimberly: yes, definitely. dana: that the united nations has not heard in a long, long time. he paused for the applause. even when they were reluctanto applaud, he waited. that s a gift.e ivonne deal. and president obama going with the assembly wanting to be the good copy and wanting to be liked. there s a big difference. i think the president defines himself better when he discusses foreign policy. there may be elements that i disagree with. there may be elements that people of government disagree with but you cannot fault him