the statute or legislative history that supports its bizarre interpretation of the law and attempt to really turn this part of the law on its head. they re doing it because if they don t, then there will be a greater backlash against obama care and congress will have to reopen it. shortsighted because the precedences are getting laid down that will have effects in the future. the president has decided he can interpret the law how he wants, they get exemptions, they don t. isn t there a danger the republican president could come in and start interpreting obama care in his way and basically gut it? there is. fortunately we have a way of stopping the president or this particular abuse of his power. there have been four lawsuits if filed in federal court to block niece illegal subsidies and taxes. one of them just had a hearing this week. we might get rulings on one or more of them by the end of this year. the sooner the better. we are talking about this isn t chump change we r talki
problem or is it just the perception of it? well, you ve got to let him have more appointments. i think there is a potential right now. yeah. and the obama administration should have seen this coming. they could have somehow and still can send out signals of what they intend to do with these higher decisions and the departure of nancy ann diparlo means there have got to be more women in the pipeline that the obama administration will appoint. i don t see how they can t be doing it because women were the backbone of the obama support for reelection. if we look at modern times and what past precedences have done, we look at president george w. bush increasing the number of women in his cabinet for 19% of his first term and the 24% in his second. president bill clinton saw the percentage of women rise from 27 to 44%. do you think that this could be the first time that we don t see the needle moving forward for a second term administration if president obama doesn t make some really sh
hurt on the raid on osama bin laden s compound. what s going on? i m wolf blitzer. you re in the situation room. captions by vitac www.vitac.com as they should be, republicans are ecstatic over their victory in wisconsin where republican governor scott walker empress ofly survived a recall vote. democrats are on the defensive and president obama is taking heat for not going wisconsin to help his fellow democrats. what does all of this mean for november? let s go live to dana bash. she s in milwaukee right now and working on the fallout. dana, there s a lot of fallout. reporter: there sure is. the democratic chairwoman, debbie wasserman schultz told our candy crowley that it would be, quote, a dry run for democrats in november. if that s the case, the president is in trouble in wisconsin and the re-election prospects could be in jeopardy. the results here are far from clear cut when it comes to the presidential race. the energy in scott walker s victory hall was pa
congress and asked what he made of trump s recent comments. it means that he s whipping up hatred to scapegoat a minority religious group which has some very dangerous historic precedences as you might agree. it s the kind of behavior that s classic demagoguery. he s going to get somebody hurt. i don t suppose he cares much. but it should be the kind of behavior that is roundly denounced. and the thing that scares me is that the more he says outrageous inflammatory things it seems like it doesn t seem to cost him in terms of support, which makes me a little bit worried about the people who support him. you just said he s going to get somebody hurt. what do you mean by that? what i mean is that when leaders who have a national platform whip up hate and hysteria against a particular group, particularly a religious group, minority religious group