Consistent with the policies and objectives of the citys general plan. The appeal also demands specific modifications to the project including the following. Limiting the height and modifications to the reuse Center Buildings and a reduction of the new building near laurel and euclid to preserve more open space and further limits on the types of nonresidential uses proposed. Related to the height of the Center Buildings, the Planning Commission supported the overall scale including the height because their placement in the center of the site set back from the public rights of way was a project objective. The project would place shorter buildings along the perimeter between 40 and 65 feet to serve the transition to the taller buildings in the center. A reduction in height of the Center Building would result in a reduction in dwelling unit count or to keep the unit count consistent, 744, and increase to other proposed New Buildings along the perimeter and compromising the compatibility.
Minor deviations from the provisions. Please recommend that the new uses that were not described in the draft eir be eliminated including flexible retail which as noted before us and not permitted in district two. Or, social services, or other services because the public was deprived of the opportunity to even comment on this in the e. I. R. As you can see, from the drawing, he used and the developer site plan the modifications shown the Community Preservation lookalike would achieve the same units while both using a required project open space, Natural Green spaces the public has used for Recreational Purposes and retaining historic list of characteristics. We ask you recommend against all of the items today, send this back and have a community and city Planning Project as this one that has been totally dominated by the developer. Thank you. I did call the novelties, let me call a few more speaker cards. [ name indescernible ] if you line up to my left, youre right. Good afternoon. I
Versus enforceability of what really is underpinning which i completely associate myself with, as a matter of public policy, about whether or not whoever is in that spot, do the community right. Do you end up with a store that does not do the community right, or a vacancy . I am willing to take that bet. Trader joes is willing to live without. Insofar as we are actually changing a piece of formula retail legislation to bring them in. That enticement was here which is precisely why this is on the calendar. I would respectfully, in addition to the change i indicated on page three relatively to the unsupportable finding of a non formula Retail Grocery store being less affordable which i would remove, and i will make a motion to that so it would start with a capital, this one time left on the and tended to support. And then i would agree with the recommendation of the Planning Commission on page five, subsection c, to be eliminated. I would suggest that we keep, on pages six, section e and
Approving this project. You could not be looking at a more appropriate project. The site is currently occupied by a genuinely on pre, sit and significance suburban office of his building which should have never been constructed in a residential neighborhood. It is a great place to put housing. You also have an excellent sponsor. I am personally and professionally up acquainted with the sponsor. He and i worked together, many years ago, when he was starting his career. We worked for a Company Whose job was to invest on behalf of pension funds, including the pension fund and the city and county of San Francisco. Due to their enlightened leadership in our hard work, we made a lot of money for that pension fund. Your retirees are more financially secure, as a result of our efforts. I am very proud of that. I am aware of his work, i am aware of i have watched it throughout their growth growth. They are a group, they have a significant axis two resources to complete this project on time, wit
That house, that exact same house, would sell today for 1. 4 million, perhaps more. We have created this lack of affordability, and we need to do something about it. You, today, have that opportunity to do something, by approving this project. You could not be looking at a more appropriate project. The site is currently occupied by a genuinely on pre, sit and significance suburban office of his building which should have never been constructed in a residential neighborhood. It is a great place to put housing. You also have an excellent sponsor. I am personally and professionally up acquainted with the sponsor. He and i worked together, many years ago, when he was starting his career. We worked for a Company Whose job was to invest on behalf of pension funds, including the pension fund and the city and county of San Francisco. Due to their enlightened leadership in our hard work, we made a lot of money for that pension fund. Your retirees are more financially secure, as a result of our