It hit 25 years ago, exactly four minutes from now, at 5 04. Loma preyet that, a 6. 9 quake that rocked the bay area and in the process uncovered many weaknesses. This picture of the terrifying yet iconic image of the bay bridge says so much about what happened that day. A 50foot gap on the upper deck. 25 years later, this is what that section of the bay bridge looks like. Replaced and reopened just last year. And it wasnt just the bay bridge. This is the cypress freeway. Both levels of the road collapsed. It took 11 years to redesign and rebuild that area. Tonight nbc bay areas Michelle Roberts reports on how much weve learned and how far weve come and the problems that still need to be solved. Reporter thats right. That moment of silence will happen in just a couple of minutes. This event today is all about being prepared. Ways to volunteer and also protect your home. There are many different booths to get information tonight. Some experts do say were a long way from being as prepare
They appear on your calendar today. That does appear that the members of the public to speak to the item and i would encourage the members of the public to speak to the item only for new information and even though i called them up together i recommend that we take action separately. Okay. Good afternoon, president fong and commissioners Planning Department staff is joining me is joy, senior planner. And before you is an appeal of a preliminary negative declaration for the project that includes the 6th story mixed use building including 75 residential units and 970 square feet of retail use and 47 Parking Spaces after the july 18th hearing, commissioner sugaya raised the concerns about the vibration and the impacts on the Club Building which is a historic resource. And the concerns that you should have before you, and dated august first and the email from the Environmental Review dated august 5th. And the tech report from the project sponsor. And the report offered several possible met
Thank you everyone. Miss miller could you please call item no. 3. Item no. 3 is an ordinance implementing San Franciscos Housing Preservation and production polices and goals. And this and the sponsors are supervisor Christina Olague and cosponsors supervisor kim, campos and myself. Supervisor olague. This is a piece of, i guess, a policy that we have been working on or i have been working on since i was on the Planning Commission and working at senior action network. At that time we approached and sue hester has been working on and advocating for this for a long time, as has Community Council for housing organizations and others. And basically its to try to set up a monitoring and reporting Program Within the Planning Department. Its an ordinance that would amend the admin code to implement a monitoring and reporting Program Within the Planning Department. Again, when i was at senior action network, this is another place we approached supervisor kims office to look into this. And this
Closed Public Comment because they appear on your calendar today. That does appear that the members of the public to speak to the item and i would encourage the members of the public to speak to the item only for new information and even though i called them up together i recommend that we take action separately. Okay. Good afternoon, president fong and commissioners Planning Department staff is joining me is joy, senior planner. And before you is an appeal of a preliminary negative declaration for the project that includes the 6th story mixed use building including 75 residential units and 970 square feet of retail use and 47 Parking Spaces after the july 18th hearing, commissioner sugaya raised the concerns about the vibration and the impacts on the Club Building which is a historic resource. And the concerns that you should have before you, and dated august first and the email from the Environmental Review dated august 5th. And the tech report from the project sponsor. And the repor
Public to speak to the item only for new information and even though i called them up together i recommend that we take action separately. Okay. Good afternoon, president fong and commissioners Planning Department staff is joining me is joy, senior planner. And before you is an appeal of a preliminary negative declaration for the project that includes the 6th story mixed use building including 75 residential units and 970 square feet of retail use and 47 Parking Spaces after the july 18th hearing, commissioner sugaya raised the concerns about the vibration and the impacts on the Club Building which is a historic resource. And the concerns that you should have before you, and dated august first and the email from the Environmental Review dated august 5th. And the tech report from the project sponsor. And the report offered several possible methods of and the vibration could be avoid. Construction is a common situation . San francisco. And the codes and regulations adequately address the