struck to keep about 1,000 jobs in the u.s. instead of sending them to mexico. what message does it send to mexican leaders. we hear contradictory messages. one side, yes, we hear about globalization is here to stay. all economies are related, each and every one with the other. then with donald trump we hear first populism. his messages are addressed to his audiences, not to the people in the united states. he s just a marked man and that kind of message is populist demagogue. we need to have clarity. we need to hear from trump what is the real position. one clear message was the case of carrier.
federal loan guarantee from the government and went bankrupt. the i.g. found a decree that had solyndra management misled officials about its finances and prospects but, more importantly, those government officials missed clear warning signs about the company because they were so eager to push out a new loan. more evidence, stewart, government should not be a venture capitalist because of the political pressure but because when you re playing with other people s money, taxpayer money, you make bad calls. i think margaret thatcher said that. mary, hit or miss? this is a miss for venezuelan president who is generating a hateful witch-hunt against foreigners in order to explain his country s economic crisis. this week he deported some 1,000 colombians. he s cletenning to close the border. now he is not the first populist
sure, that s what we call a populist demagogue. hu huey long used to say there will be a chicken in every pot. well, there wasn t a chicken in every pot. i think if you want to give donald trump a true comparison, et he s like ross perot, a billionaire with interesting ideas tapping into what we call the third party energy of the united states. but trump at least had perot at least had pie charts and was trying to explain in the a real way whereas fareed points out trump wings it. so there hasn t been anybody like donald trump because he s a genius at brand building and very media savvy in his own way, not a traditional way but in the new social media world. i think if the republican party sees him as a danger, a rat snake, a poison toad they have to get rid of somehow because he very well may lurch into a third
needs. he s a populist demagogue. he s illiberal, a socialist, and he s out of sync. people think still of the constitution as something that came from above. they met while he was writing the latest book, india grows at night. he says he has his sights set on the wrong target. what kadriwha rails against is the type of cronyism that in one case alone costs india as much as $40 billion. when higher officials were alleged to have sold off big portions of india s mobile airwaves. but that s a problem which really hits about 1% of indians. instead of worrying about corruption at the highest level, worry about the corruption in your neighborhood. one of the men at the highest levels of indian government, alawahi, agrees corruption is a daily phenomenon, but he says the government is responding. lots of people look at india