Violence d. G. O. And the deaf and hard of hearing which is coming up for a vote later this month. But you should know that we were meeting on the d. V. Domestic violence d. G. O. For four years before this, before the new process was put into place, and so those meetings were not happening without sfpd, those were meetings with the d. P. A. , the Domestic Violence consortium and other shake holders and sf stakeholders and sfpd for four years, and we could not get this to the commission. Now were starting over, or theres a chance to start it over in this new process, so we support this resolution. Also, the deaf and hard of hearing, which we talked about a month ago, thats been worked on at the table for two years. Every day that sfpd does not have these updated d. G. O. S, san franciscans are in jeopardy. This must happen. I also signed onto a letter that was not available to the public that really delineated the process from bay area legal aid. We were honored to sign onto it, and we
A question for clarification on this issue, i had a clarification. So there was detailed letters from the d. P. A. With the line item at, like, line edited revision. There was also letters from the bay area legal and the d. V. Consortium. And somehow, they werent identified i dont know whats the right word, kbut there were people concerned about this resolution. They were filed under 30day correspondence with the commission. People were looking for them, and they didnt know there was input from all of these different groups. Some criticism, and some requests for modifications, and the input. Just for the agendas sake, i wonder why this wasnt identified under the resolution . Why was it just, like, 30day correspondence . Im concerned about the way it was listed in the agenda. Im not sure giving people notice that there was a lot more information regarding this resolution. Vice president taylor commissioner elias or hamasaki . [inaudible] Vice President taylor im sorry. Commissioner hama
Candid discussion. Someone who pays close attention to what the commission does, i think the commissions resolution has much to be recommended, including establishing a time limit on the back end of the process updated d. G. O. Neglects a serious problem in the process itself how long it takes to get the d. G. O. To concurrence in the first place. The usdoj recommended the d. G. O. Process be reviewed every five years. My time on the Bias Working Group was well spent, and id like to thank those who shepherded us through this process. But these items have taken so long to go from conception to commission. To we cant wait while the streets suffer. Commissioner elias made that quite clear. Neither should the commission be hindered by the meet and confer process. Binding Court Precedent holds that d. G. O. S focused on policy decisions dont trigger meet and confer, nor is it needed to bring these changes to fruition. Sfpd needs it, the public demands it, and i urge you to adopt the d. P. A
Any Public Comments . Next week is our last meeting for the year and we wont convene until the second wednesday in january. Any Public Comment . Okay. Public comment is closed. Line item 3, discussion and possible action to approve protocols for release of sb 1421 documents for purpose of engaging in the meet and confer process with the Police Officers association, discussion and possible action. A working group spent quite a bit of time preparing this set of protocols. And commissioner mazzucco and elias took the lead on behalf of the commission. So i will turn this over to them. Thank you, commissioner hirsch. We received, first we want to again thank the individuals who participated in the working group. It was very informative and it was good to see everyone in the room at the table and having open and fluid conversation with each other. We received a lot of requests and recommendations with respect to the language for the 1421. Commissioner mazzucco and is intention in terms of pr
Its a sunshine ordinance and the Public Record act and government code complaint and they should file complaints or they can bring lawsuits if theyre not getting their records. Thats the remedy. Im president taylor. Im good. Does anybody else want to say anything . If you do, put your name up there. All right. Nobody does. All right, so can we have a motion to approve the protocol with the amendment made by commissioner alias adding the word or after section 1a. Adding two words. The word o and the word which after b2. And the correction that is made. Is there a motion. So moved. A second. Second. Weve had public comment. All in favor. Aye. Opposed. It passes unanimously. So the next step will be to get this over to the City Attorney and to get this over to Human Resources and well get them back and be able to discuss with us what we have to do and meet and confer if anything. Next item clerk line item 4. Presentations regarding reless of sb1421 documents. Limits will apply. Discussion