application? they have door to door canvassers that don t fill the forms out right, get the date of birth wrong or the address wrong. i don t think it is stacey abrams that orchestrated this, it is these paid canvassers doing the forms wrong, but that s what the law is. i have to follow it. everybody has to follow it. stacey abrams, brian kemp, anybody registered to vote has to have information that s verifiable. i don t understand what her deal is except she wants to make a big deal. and this is the kemp statement. 53,000 cited in the complaint can vote in the november 6 election like jack was saying. any claim to the contrary are politically motivated and utterly false. your take? the abrams campaign has come out and encouraged these folks to go out and vote. so secretary kemp is right that anyone that s on the list who have been deemed inactive or cannot be registered to vote now because of the exact provision, they can go in and vote. herein lies the bigger problem.
Points-don-t
Stacey-abrams
Application
Canvassers
Address
Birth
Door-to-canvassers
Everybody
Deal
Vote
Law
Brian-kemp
does. decrease the corporate tax rate, that s going to be beneficial to small businesses and job creators. we need more people employed after obamacare crushed a lot of business. this is a way to put people back to work and americans to keep more of their money. jon: if that proves to be the case, isaac, is the supposition that democrats will romp in the 2018 elections, does that go skating on very thin ice? let s see what s in the bill. they talking points don t match what the republicans on the hill have said they ll do. we don t know for sure. they ve negotiated it in secret and haven t made it public. so we can see on november 1st. paul ryan admit ted himself they negotiated us in secret and we ll see if it matches their rhetoric or lawrence s instead. jon: how confident are you?
People
Lot
Businesses
Tax-rate
Job-creators
Obamacare
The-way
Jon
Case
Money
America
Democratic-national-committee
community shouldn t be doing talking points for policy makers. it s not an appropriate role. i would say if you do talking points don t edit them and allow them to be politicized in the way they were. the bigger take, so interesting to watch the hearings, but of the apparent consensus. everybody up there that al-qaeda is such a severely diminished threat. you know, nobody said we don t need to worry about it. but the clear message out of the hearings was that the potential for a strike on the homeland is minimal. they especially down played potential threat of growing al-qaeda, you know, the geographic distribution. and strengthening of al-qaeda in the region. i think it s, it s something that i was watching it and thinking this is a hearing we could see played back later after an attack. bret: to that point, about the diminished effectiveness of al-qaeda. here is the national intelligence director and then the story we brought you last week about the documents,
Talking-points
Way
Hearings
Points-don-t
Policy-makers
Stake
Role
Threat
Al-qaeda
Everybody
Message
Potential