media company behind that video. that really does wrap it up for me this hour. thank you for watching. deadline white house with my friend nicolle wallace starts right now. hi, everyone. it s 4:00 in new york. deputy attorney general rod rosenstein took his fragile piece with the president out for a stress test yesterday in a rare and expansive interview with t the wall street journal. he defended the mueller probe and offered to stay on the job despite the constant stream of insults about the investigation he oversees and the department of justice in general. for as long as the president pleases. rosenstein telling the journal, quote, people are entitled to be frustrated. i can accept that. but at the end of the day, the public will have confidence that the cases we brought were warranted by the evidence and that it was an appropriate use of resources. those cases include the criminal indictments of the president s former campaign chairman, his former national security adviser
tomorrow. reporter: dominic and his wife sylvia never imagined they would see their house like this. we didn t think the fire was going to come here, so we didn t really take things out. like everybody else that was scrambling at the last minute to get out when we saw the fire on the ridge. reporter: officials say more extreme temperatures are in the forecast and it will only continue to make this fire all the more worrisome. it is one of several major pleases burning across the state and one of some 89 across the country. this is that new normal, that unpredictability, the large explosive growth fires. reporter: leaving firefighters working to control the flames and limit the damage as residents race against the clock to evacuate their homes. paul vercammen, cnn, redding, california. california over and over again we see this every year. difficult visuals to see and difficult to hear about the grandmother and two children that are missing. but the carr fire is one that
finland. they know how to do these summits, beer summits or otherwise. why are you in helsinki? what s the significance there? it s been a long-standing tradition for presidents of the united states to meet with the leader of russia here. this country borders russia. it s very neutral. they pledged neutrality after world war ii. they allow for friendly ties because they wanted to get along with the east and with the west. and never joined nato or the other alliances. that s right. that pleases president putin for sure. we were expecting protests. we were expecting people to have strong political opinions. 100,000 in london. that s right. we went to the marketplace. this is the presidential palace, the yellow, that s one of his residence, that s where the summit will be hold. across the street, the baltic sea and along the sea is the marketplace. we were asking people what they thought about the summit. we were expecting them to have strong political opinions and
good f. it does, others will pick up the pleases. the big winner out of the disruption now is china. they have a clear vision of what they want from the world and from the united states and they re pretty much getting it and even on the trade tariffs, the chinese are driving a hard bargain and not playing ball with the united states. and they stand to benefit strongly from the summit and from sanctions if they do get relieved of north korea. so i think in the big picture, that s the big picture. obviously, we have to say that it ask really important that this meeting will be happening because it takes the immediate threat of nuclear war, as crazy as it sounds, that s what everybody was fearful about and it sort of takes that off of the table and puts it in the realm
we have in fantasy now that republicans back then were so much the establishment so much more noble than mitch mcconnell and paul ryan. no therapy wooses too. they talked off the record not for attribute using with journalists. . they didn t get with the program until it was almost too late. you had smoking guns. let s remember nicken s support was bipartisan. because no those days we had dynamicic senators from pleases like mississippi and alabama. and they were staunch nixon supporters. exactly. right now people say well there is a republican congress that will protect trump or there is a democratic congress that could have taken out nixon. but that s just apples and oranges because actually the votes supporting nixon included a lot of democrats, southern conservative democrats who would later my grate to the republican party but had not yet. this is one of the things that surprised me and makes