speculation has been so rampant for the last few days that it is more a relief in a sense than a shock. the sun broke relief in a sense than a shock. the sun broke the relief in a sense than a shock. the sun broke the story in its saturday paper, alleging that a high profile, unnamed presenter at the bbc had paid £35,000 to a much younger person for sexually explicit images, beginning when the young individual was 17. more allegations were front page every day since, although on monday, the lawyerfor page every day since, although on monday, the lawyer for the young person said the story was rubbish and nothing criminal had taken place. some will now be asking whether the sun has questions to answer for its decisions. tonight the papersaid. it answer for its decisions. tonight the paper said. it added that it at no point in the original story alleged criminality and also took the decision neither to name huw edwards nor the young person involved in the allegations. mitt; edwards n
what i think of it, it is interesting what ukrainians think about stopping any quote to you the words of the economic advisor to president zelensky who says this of you being in moscow last week doing your energy deals. he says you have to be completely blind not to see what kinds of crimes you in hungary are sponsoring, buying more gas from the russians means you are simply giving them more capacity to escalate the war. giving them more capacity to escalate the war. ok, so, can i answer now? escalate the war. ok, so, can i answer now? go escalate the war. ok, so, can i answer now? go ahead. - escalate the war. ok, so, can i answer now? go ahead. thank| escalate the war. ok, so, can i- answer now? go ahead. thank you so much. answer now? go ahead. thank you so much- so answer now? go ahead. thank you so much. so once answer now? go ahead. thank you so much. so once again, answer now? go ahead. thank you so much. so once again, it - answer now? go ahead. thank you so much. so
in fact, actually need money t help push back on these things so, i think he has been someon who has had this doublespeak that he s been able to do. and at the end of the day th person who is the people who are really go t answer that question of whethe he needs to pick a lane, i going to be republican voters. so far, you have not seen, a least four of the base that he has his 30% that is sticking with him - and i don t think it s growing based on the road my reporting on the reporting that we hav seen from these places - but sadly that 30%, they are not saying that you have t pick a lane, they are no forcing him to backtrack in th way that you have to speak about his legal problems or hi political problems, in fac they continue to sort of b with him, as you see a republican party that ha continued to be with him more and more people are jumping into the republica amidation. easy tim scott - senator tim scott jumping in, while also still in some, ways backing this ide that former p
he just said last night in a interview that when he was arraigned last week, court staffers were weeping. they were crying because the were so upset for him. and at the same time, he i saying, i can t be tried in ne york city. this town hates me i won t get a fair shot. so, which one is it? it s a key question but from what i can tell i reporting on former presiden trump, he does not fee pressure to pick a lane. he can say that this is a witc hunt, that this is all wrong while also being able to say, need to raise money to be able to fight these real problems that i have, these problem that i might have legal real legal attention to, becaus they are serious enough that they actually need to figh them, they are not just thes frivolous claims that are goin up in the sky. in fact, actually need money t help push back on these things so, i think he has been someon who has had this doublespeak that he s been able to do. and at the end of the day th person who is the people who are reall
of the ears of the former president, who has previously called it kind of the crossing of a red line. but, you know, jack smith says, too bad. everybody s testimony is you know, has to come before the grand jury. which is interesting because the former president did not try to invoke executive privilege when it came to the january 6th committee specifically for his daughter and son-in-la they went and testified. we talked about that. does he have any credible argument here? we know he s going to try to invoke it related to former vice president pence. i mean the t answer oh. well, vice president pence, he will make an executive privilege arnts, he s made them before, as have others, and by now the d.c. courts have made quick work of it. and i think it will as well. remember, benpence has taken another tack. he s going to take a pretty farfetched argument under the speech and debate clause under