related question about russia and i m not sure how much evidence there is there at the moment or whether the saga will end very soon, but it s quite clear that is embroiling the domestic, the dissident program or diverting it and i think that could have long-term political effects. but in the end, the discussions about impeachment and that kind of thing i think are far too premature. we have yet to see any real concrete evidence and my own view which i think is developing, like everybody else, we are still trying to grasp what is going on, is that this is a unique moment where the democratic party is pillaring the president for taking stance with their disagreement with foreign policy and almost accusing him of being aiding a foreign power. this is normally a tactic used by more right wing political parties when the other party wins office, suggesting that they are either agents of the pope or agents of moscow or free
the fault of insurance companies. some is oversight and some of that is the website not working right for a long time. but it s the president s job to make sure as many people get health insurance as possible and that s what he s doik here. doing here. on two successive adjustments the white house has made, you end up in a situation where the right has been pillaring the president. oh, people s plans are being canceled. the president says, okay, we ve heard you, we re going to extend the grandfather period, we re going to allow people to go back to those old plans. they say well, you re imposing the mandate. okay, okay, we heard you, and then, the response by conservatives be like, well, they re just yanging everybody around, doing whatever they please as opposed to saying they re navigating in response to criticism. the first thing where they said they re going to extend the grandfathering on these plans, people asked the white house,
facilities in the juvenile justice system? yes. although clearly not as good. no, there is nowhere near as good. from my standpoint, instead of pillaring this judge, who by all accounts is not a whack job and not somebody outside of the mainstream. i don t know her but except that she sent a black kid who punched someone, and that person fell and died, she sentenced him to ten years in prison. correct. ten years in prison, but this kid who killed four people gets off on. i could pick judge after judge after judge, prosecutor after prosecutor after prosecutor where there is disparity because of race and means. what i m telling you is it should be a pivot point for a discussion as to why we don t have the rehab facilities and why we don t have the juvenile justice facilities to handle somebody like this. because i think she looked at the kid and said he wouldn t survive. that is ridiculous! who cares if he doesn t survive, mark?
it isn t newly discovered. as far as this idea and let s get some terms straight. first of all, this kid is not eligible for prison. this kid is at most is eligible for was eligible for juvenile system at max of three years until he was 19. the prosecutor has no right to appeal this. that are just doing for lack of a better term, a show boat. plenty of kids do, if they don t have money, do get sent to the juvenile justice system in the state of texas. and when they are an adult, they go to the adult prison there is no question he would be sentenced to the juvenile system, that s a given there are rehab facilities but not as good nowhere near as good. instead of pillaring this judge who by all accounts is not a whack job, wing nut, outside of the main stream, very well-thought of. accept that she sent a black
no money, they do get sentenced to prison. there is no question that he could have been sentenced to the juvenile justice system, that is a given. and there are rehab facilities, although clearly not as good. no, there is nowhere near as good. from my standpoint, instead of pillaring this judge, who by all accounts is not a whack job, i don t know her except that she sent a black kid who punched someone, and that person fell and died, she sentenced him to ten years in prison. correct. ten years, this kid killed four people. i could pick judge after judge after judge, prosecutor after prosecutor after prosecutor where there is disparity because of race and means. what i m telling you is it should be a pivot point for a discussion as to why we don t havehab facilities and