a public statement that was put out by the entire intelligence committee, which susan rice on the 16th, who was asked to go before the people and use that statement, did. i have read every one of the five interviews she did that day. she was within the context of that statement. and for this, she has been pillaried for two months. i don t understand it. it has to stop. if it continues, it s going to set up once again a partisan divide in these the house and the senate, which congressman rogers and i have tried to overcome and have overcome with some success with respect to the intelligence committees. congressman rogers, to my understanding, talking to government officials, is that what susan rice said on meet the press five days after the attack and other programs as well, was very similar to what then director petraeus said
its institutions to have to pay for something that is against their religious teachings violates their religious rights. and i think that s the but the blount amendment said that any employer with a moral objection, religious or otherwise, didn t have to provide access to contrsection. how is that consistent with him saying every woman should have access? it has to be a real objection. certainly if they were faking the objection, i think they would be pillaried in public coverage of it. the truth is the catholic church, for example, which is the impetus of this, has a well-founded, longtime and historical opposition to contraception. they teach that in the church. and the obama rule and the obama administration s ruling and mandates on this issue run counter to those religious protections that are constitutional principles. true or untrue on abortion. governor romney has said he would sign a bill that banned abortion, should that come to his desk. and i think what he is sayin
to force the catholic church or its institutions to have to pay for something that is against their religious teachings violates their religious rights. and i think that s the but the blount amendment said that any employer with a moral objection, religious or otherwise, didn t have to provide access to contrsection. how is that consistent with him saying every woman should have access? it has to be a real objection. certainly if they were faking the objection, i think they would be pillaried in public coverage of it. the truth is the catholic church, for example, which is the impetus of this, has a well-founded, longtime and historical opposition to contraception. they teach that in the church. and the obama rule and the obama administration s ruling and mandates on this issue run counter to those religious protections that are constitutional principles. true or untrue on abortion. governor romney has said he would sign a bill that banned abortion, should that come to his desk
people from gaining access to contraception. this happens to conflict with a constitutional liberty. and the catholic church teaches against contraception. to force the catholic church or its institutions to have to pay for something that is against their religious teachings violates their religious rights. and i think that s the but the blount amendment said that any employer with a moral objection, religious or otherwise, didn t have to provide access to contraception. how is that consistent with him saying every woman should have access? it has to be a real objection. certainly if they were faking the objection, i think they would be pillaried in public coverage of it. the truth is the catholic church, for example, which is the impetus of this, has a well-founded, longtime and historical opposition to contraception. they teach that in the church. and the obama rule and the obama administration s ruling and mandates on this issue run counter to those religious protections that
jimmy carter when our last ambassador was murder. jimmy carter professed to be quote shocked and surprised that our ambassador in kabul could be butchered in 1979. this president missed the point. we ll stand by when christianity is pillaried. you don t see christians burning mosques. you don t see christians rising up to lynch people on the streets. so the moral parody between those events that happened on 9-11-12 and 9-11-01. there is no moral parity. this adversary is not going away. not with standing what we were told at the democratic convention that the al qaeda has