legal analyst greg jerrett along with former floridagr attorney general pam bondi. bothey of you, thanks so much fi being here tonight .gr greg, let me start with you. you ve got a great piece up ate fox news.comfo talking about the constitutional hurdles of this . oh , that pesky document that they wish they could circumvent yetan again.on it might be the one thingri standing between us and a gun grab. . yeah, i mean, look, it s understandable that emotions are running high and emotions sometimes lead to action, but those actions aren t always lawful. and joe biden can demonize the nra, gun manufacturers and republicans only want that s not his problem. the problem is that pesky t document called the constitutionhame and specifically the second amendment in the landmarkci heller decision, the united states supreme court validated o the individualur right to keep and bear arms. they said some limitede regulations are permissible. thenan they named them keeping guns out of the hands o
and that s again his best interest. ment tesla. i give him a lot of credit for saying that. he s right on all fronts. you re right, he s a great innovator. kelly ann conway, thank you, reince priebus, thank you. we ll talk about the slow-moving war on ukraine targeting innocent civilians, men, women, and children. here with fox news, strategic analyst general jack keen is with us. it seems to have taken on a more civilian aggressive strategy at this point. and indiscriminate bombing of innocent men, women, and children. i m not exactly sure what that means. fox news.com, general, they had a piece up that said that we might expect more of that more nuclear sabre rattling by vladimir as you get more desperate. what is your take? what s happened here is we have a steal mate in the north and in the battle for kyiv and
that being said they were at the white house, on the national security council. they saw and heard things, those at the state department and out in kyiv did not. a new piece up, and you argue that the impeachment hearings evicerate the president and show how he broke the rules. reads in part, there are regular things that u.s. emissaries do that involve quid pro quos or conditions. why is it okay and how is it different from what the president did here? let s look at how these exchanges work in diplomacy. we ask for certain conditions, access to military forces, access to certain political leaders or decisions, but we always look out through a process and weigh those asks against other interests that the united states have. none of that took place here. i actually would go so far to
inquired of. i keep trying to figure out what was he doing that was helpful to the president last night and nothing comes to mind. you have a new piece up for wired. the headline reading as follows, trump must be a russian agent. the alternative is too awful. lay out then what the alternative is. when you look at the last five days of revelations that we have had about the president s strange behavior in terms of russia and vladimir putin, his conversations with putin privately, some of the revelations we have seen, it would really almost be embarr s embarrassing for the president if it comes out that robert mueller concludes that he was not an active agent of the russian government as part of this whole period.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20190116:03:45:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.