th he s honest. you said that democrats might jump too strongly on the impeachment issue. yes. does that mean that if the democrats take the house they should not impeach donald trump? i think they should wait on the investigations that are going on now, mueller, et al, what they arrive at. but i think it is true that you don t want to do things that will have an affect that you didn t count on. and clearly if the democrats try to impeach donald trump it will energize his base as well as their base and whether or not that s a good thing, the country needs to have donald trump change some of his policies and do the things that i think are right in a way that s much more respectful of people. i certainly have said my piece about the trump presidency, but we want him to be a good president and people say, i hate the guy. you have a right when it comes to the next election, vote for somebody else.
endorsed the conclusions of the prior intelligence officials, clapper, brennan, et al. so he came down squarely on that. the question about whether or not vladimir putin had compromising material on either donald trump or his family, putin said when then civilian businessman donald trump was in moscow, he didn t know him. there were 500 other accidentbun there. he said i know how dossiers are created. so he did go there. but where to start because the president just completely wandered into this territory. i would have thought he d want to deflect it, but he just decimated the questions about whether or not there was russian intelligence, despite the very detailed indictment of 12 russian military intelligence operatives that came only on friday. this is only going to add to the firestorm back home.
excited. of course there has been a tremendous amount of mobilizing here in georgia, so yes, we have a huge blue wave that we re riding on right now. that wave affords people like me, you know, i m not a politician, al, you know, but it affords people like me to be able to stand up and move forward to make an impact in washington on the things that are concerning to the people that live in my district, the sixth congressional district. they re very, very concerned not only about gun violence and keeping their children safe, but they re concerned about health care. i m a two-time breast cancer survivor, so i know how important it is that everyone have access to good health care. they re very concerned about the tax scam, as we ve been calling it, trying to make sure that our middle class families and small businesses have some tax relief. just very concerned about making sure our children have access to good education. i run a nonprofit because of that very reason. i want to make sure t
handcuffs and we re going to create an ordeal and dehumanize these people. i think that starbucks is going to have to decide who it s going to be in a public specter, in a public policy realm as we think about the structural conditions impacting black people in this country and poor people in general. so for example right now in seattle there s a city council bill that s moving or that has moved and there s a repeal attempt to it to make companies like starbucks pay a little more tax per employee to use that pot of money to help homeless people in the city. well, starbucks et al, they don t want to pay more money to help homeless people in terms of their taxes. so the question becomes are you practicing what you preach at the end of the day in your philanthro philanthropy? and in your business practices. do you bank with minority banks. there s all kinds of ways. but jamil, she went right there to my home spot and that is law enforcement, because the one
a subpoena from mueller s team. and this is already laying out the argument. you have giuliani talking to kristen welker and other reporters, saying the president s just too busy on foreign policy. it s not the time. he s sending every signal to mueller, we re not going to do it. john heilemann, cambridge analytica, to take nothing away from the reporting of the new york times on this story, it stands to reason, correct, that mueller et al. would be taking a good, hard look at cambridge analytica? it does. look, one of the now we talk about the mueller probe in rumsfeldian terms. i ve heard this recently starting to creep into our dialogue where we talk about the known knowns, the unknown unknowns. one of the known unknowns is that bob mueller is going to issue indictments for sure that relate to the hacking of the democratic party s e-mail