otherwise, again, look, i know there s a lot of left-right on this. we report on it, analyze it, cry about it, scream about it all the time that a lot of this seems to be more about an imus than analysis, but look, if you re the head of a state and this is what s coming your way, of course, you re going to go to your people and say i ll have to figure this out for us because this wasn t helpful. isn t that how you have people going it on their own? look, i think this creates confusion that gives fodder to the people that want to sow skepticism. the problem is this is a byzantine schedule in terms of who will be eligible. in order to implement this seamlessly. the person working in cvs and walgreens needs the guidance. if the guidance is this confusing and requires this many steps and is hard to have eligibility it will create obstacles to those in many cases
seamlessly, the person working in cvs or walgreens needs to interpret the guidance. if the guidance is this confusing and requires this many steps and is hard to have eligibility it will create obstacles to those in many cases are getting access to health care and people can navigate the system and will get boosters and the people who rely on the system to be easy, they re the ones who may be locked out here. it s unfortunate. it could create obstacles for the very people we want to make sure are brought into the system. dr. scott gottlieb, appreciate you. thank you very much. thanks a lot. now to another situation with mixed messaging and the confusion of outcome. what s going to happen on monday? will they vote on the infrastructure bill? will they vote on the reconciliation bill? will they vote on both. we have a key member of congress and she ll lead on the safety of vaccines for kids and we ll talk about the state of play about the wellness of her party and what it means for
plot to set off a bomb in a crowded market. a, , a, plot to set off a bomb in a crowded market. a, , ., , h, plot to set off a bomb in a crowded market. a, , ., , ., market. he arrested that person and he took him market. he arrested that person and he took him to market. he arrested that person and he took him to the market. he arrested that person and he took him to the government - market. he arrested that person and he took him to the government and l market. he arrested that person and l he took him to the government and he has gone to jail. he has come out now. has gone to “ail. he has come out now. ., ., u, has gone to “ail. he has come out now. ., ., , ., ,., now. have the taliban come to your famil s now. have the taliban come to your family s house? now. have the taliban come to your family s house? they now. have the taliban come to your family s house? they are now. have the taliban come to your family s house? they are coming i family s house? they are co
for the person working, that hasn t said hey, listen, i m not going to work and accept the benefits, but still because so many others have, the prices for me to make ends meet every month have gone up. do you worry there could be some sort of resentment out there? i worry that it s a little bit incorrected. it s not the actual benefits that are driving up inflation. it s supply chain problems that we ve seen over and over again. that $200 plus tack credit that is landing in american family s bank accounts starting now and will continue, that is a biden plan. that s going to help alleviate some of these short-term costs that i think are relegitimate. i acknowledge that. when you look at the long-term benefits of something like the bipartisan infrastructure bill that just cleared its first hurdle this week, those are long-term investments that will create a foundation in our economy, going to create a career path over time. it s not dumping the money right