it just wasn t there? it wasn t there. they tested for everything they could and the person said they didn t see that kind of injury to her that would occur. there were knife cuts on her body, but they were superficial. the crowley family was outraged all over again that once again shannon s version of events was dismissed, while charges against her were through it. police thought she was making it up. yeah, yeah. they talk to her after they took to persecutors, yes. he called down there and changes. story everything changed. everything changed. this is what? one big conspiracy? sounds like it. assistant day david sexes the rape was properly investigated, and seem to be nothing more than a hoax. which also, for him, finally answers of who was stalking whom. everything was pointing to
so in that situation, if someone fleeing persecution from egypt passes through canada on his way to the united states, the united states might be able to send him back to canada, but not to egypt. and here the administration without such an agreement would send somebody back to their persecutors. so your argument is this is outside the power of the executives who unilaterally impose? it contradicts 40 years of congressional law. pass it in both houses and president signs it, that would be the new asylum law. right. he can t do it by himself. he can t do it overnight. can t overturn our asylum laws which are itself based on 80 years of international human rights law by fiat. and without public comment. in addition as the judge found,
job, try to apply for asylum, it s okay to say hey, look, that s not how this works. precisely. in that circumstance, we ve determined you are already safe. because that s the bottom line requirement. that s what the entire legal architecture is attempting to provide. right. and the only other circumstances called safe third country agreements, emphasis on safe, we only have one such agreement with canada, that can only apply when the two countries have equally robust asylum systems. so in that situation, if someone fleeing persecution from egypt passes through canada on his way to the united states, the united states might be able to send him back to canada, but not to egypt. and here the administration without such an agreement would send somebody back to their persecutors. so your argument is this is outside the power of the executives who unilaterally impose? it contradicts 40 years of congressional law. pass it in both houses and
a weapon of war including the rape of men. a weapon that serves to perpetuate a conflict that no one seems willing to end. the activists based in tunis have done what they can. now it s time for the international court to take over. a year has passed since yes seen first came to tunisia. he now knows he s not in fertile in that at least his persecutors have failed.
international court to take over. a year has passed since yes seen first came to tunisia. he now knows he s not in fertile in that at least his persecutors have failed. the survivors have spoken their voices are an accusation they hope the world will finally hear the. country they took on life before saying if i caught my tormentor i d have tortured him to death. but not anymore. my anger has