done an accept that globalisation which has done an immense amount to improve the lot done an immense amount to improve the lot of done an immense amount to improve the lot of mankind in the last 20 or 30 years the lot of mankind in the last 20 or 30 years is the lot of mankind in the last 20 or 30 years is going backwards, accelerating backwards and it is good accelerating backwards and it is good that people like biden can see this coming and take steps to ameliorate and if it s done through the form ameliorate and if it s done through the form of ameliorate and if it s done through the form of subsidy that s fine by me there the form of subsidy that s fine by me there is no problem with governments subsidising the industries if they think it will be an eventual return for the taxpayer dollar an eventual return for the taxpayer dollar and an eventual return for the taxpayer dollar and if there is not the us voters dollar and if there is not the us voters clearly wil
door policy, eu because we didn t want an open door policy, this government can t control door policy, this government can t control legal migration, they can t control control legal migration, they can t control so called illegal migration, and i control so called illegal migration, and i take control so called illegal migration, and i take issue with that, because no person and i take issue with that, because no person is and i take issue with that, because no person is illegal. they can t control no person is illegal. they can t control any no person is illegal. they can t control any of it. no person is illegal. they can t control any of it. there is no such thin as control any of it. there is no such thing as an control any of it. there is no such thing as an illegal control any of it. there is no such thing as an illegal migrant, - thing as an illegal migrant, absolutely right. but i think illegal migration, per se, some people would argue is what it says on the ti
what we were planning to happen. and i hope it makes notjust america better, i hope it makes notjust america better, but i hope it makes notjust america better, but as we think of engagement around the world, what lessons engagement around the world, what lessons can we draw here? and that is the lessons can we draw here? and that is the discussion here in the states is the discussion here in the states. ., , states. tom, give us the uk pempective- states. tom, give us the uk perspective. at states. tom, give us the uk perspective. at the - states. tom, give us the uk perspective. at the time, i states. tom, give us the uk. perspective. at the time, there states. tom, give us the uk- perspective. at the time, there was a significant opposition to what was happening. it came to define tony blair s leadership for many for years and years to come. there was, but this was years and years to come. there was, but this was the years and years to come. there was, but this was
no longer working. add to thatjapan is still way behind on vaccinations and it is clear that either the big wave of covid was going to strike here right about the time of the olympics if something drastic wasn t done. olympics if something drastic wasn t done. ., ., done. from the infection-control pempective done. from the infection-control pempective and done. from the infection-control perspective and also done. from the infection-control perspective and also for - done. from the infection-control perspective and also for the - done. from the infection-control. perspective and also for the ethical perspective, the spectators should not be allowed to come into the stadium. also because the government called for a state of emergency and asked people to be isolated or restricted activities. so why would the olympics be the only exception against it? but the olympics be the only exception aainst it? , , . the olympics be the only exception aiainstit? , ,. ., , against it? but
without quarantining. if they have had two vaccinations. do you think in principle that is a good idea or are you concerned from a clinical perspective? are you concerned from a clinical pempective? perspective? from a clinical pempective. perspective? from a clinical pempective. i perspective? from a clinical perspective, i would - perspective? from a clinical perspective, i would say i perspective? from a clinical perspective, i would say we | perspective? from a clinical i perspective, i would say we need perspective? from a clinical - perspective, i would say we need to exercise caution. i am also optimistic that if you are fully immunised, two vaccines, you will be mostly safe and immunised people are less infectious, so you are across the line into safe territory. having said that we need to make double sure. ., ,., said that we need to make double sure. ., y., ., | can sure. doctor, can you hear me? i can hearyou- sure. doctor, can you hear me? i can hearyou- we sure. do