reception in the doctors lounge as time went on. sure. it s hard because the docs think they re doing the right thing. tucker: right. i am not accusing them of being purposely harming their patients. tucker: no, i d never say that. they re trying to do the right thing. tucker: right. they don t understand this idea that peer review doesn t have access to the data. it s just so disparate from what has been hammered into them, from the day they took the admission test for medical school. it doesn t fit. tucker: wait. did you hear that? the scientists who, quote, peer review studies and, therefore, set the parameters of american medicine, don t have access to the full data set. in other words, they can t actually assess whether the drug works or not because they don t have the numbers. they peer review it anyway. shocking. that s one of the many things we learned from that conversation
i got an increasingly icy reception in the doctor s lounge on . sure. and it ssu hardd because the dos think they re doing the right thing. i am not choosing them of beinge purposely harming their patients. i never haveg to do the right thing right. d and they don t understand thisee idea that peer reviewr doesn t have access to the data is just so disparate from what has been hammered into them fromdi the first day they took the admission test for medical d school that it s like mind blowing. it doesn t fit. there s too much cognitive dissonance. ? wait, did you hear that ? so the scientists quote peer review studies and therefore set the parameters of american medicine don t have access too the fulll data set. in otherer words, they can t actually assess whether the drug workss or not because they don t have the numbers butv a peer review it anyway. f shocking. that s one of the many things
the non-hispanic white majority but disproportionately inhaled by black and hispanic minorities. ainsley: joining us now to react is fox news contributor and host of reality check with david webb on fox nation. david webb. hey, david, what s your reaction to this? brian: should we apologize first as white americans? i guess you should apologize because apparently i m getting different pollution right here on this side of the couch. steve: explain what they re talking about. it s gobbledy gook. peer reviewed group. a lot of time these studies are done with people by agendas enviro terrorists, ecoterrorists they want to sell you a narrative peer review it and don t assign the scientific method. be realistic about this. are their areas localized where there are air effects different than just pollution widely because of concentration of factories or concentration in urban environment? that s air quality. and that s an issue worth discussing. but when you talk about what