it s ambiguous. the context, getting a law firm involved, getting a corporation set up sounds like they wanted to do with the right way by having paper records. the word cash does apparently come out of trump s mouth but it s not completely clear in what context. in the end they say do it by check and they don t do anythin anything. so there s no crime here, there s no evidence of a crime, but lanny davis is right, it does raise questions of credibility depending on what the tape says. next step is given to a forensic expert, haven t really sweet and so we can hear precisely by stretching the words who said what and then find out why it was cut off so abruptly. forensics experts can determine whether it was artificially cut off, whether it was part of a call that was cut off. we have a lot to learn about this tape, but the most important question is who leaked it? bret: last thing very quickly. only a few seconds. if you look this russia investigation, where do you see
this was an executive order. it looks like it was meant to tamp down a bad news cycle for the president. the news cycle isn t over. you have 2,300 kids thousands of miles away from parents, dan. you also had a number of these parents who were deported to central america. so if you are in guatemala and your kid is in michigan in some foster family system or home, that is not an easy situation to connect them. also the record keeping in terms of paper records and electronic records. it is not the best. they were very hasty in how they separated families. it is not like they registered everyone and it is easy to just reunite them all. dhs has a lot of work to do to reunite these people. so they will debate this on
people don t know how to operate these things. that includes people like at the highest level in politics and government, remember the famous hack john podesta, his pass word was password. enough said. alex, what we re seeing this weekend with the denial from the white house to release the democrats memo, i wonder what you see when you know the work that has to be done to protect the 2018, 2020 elections and the role that the house intel committee could have in that, and the back and forth just these two memos with all that s on their to-do list. what we need badly is resources to the states in order to apply cybersecurity best practices, implement voting machines that have paper records and implement audits of those paper records. a bill now being considered in
what s your thought here? how likely mueller is looking at those kinds of records? mueller and his team, the very first person he put on the team was a prosecutor expert at money laundering. and donald s involvement with deals that don t make economic sense unless they involve payoffs and money laundering goes back 30 years. deutsche bank was the bank of choice for russians laundering money. it has been fined more than $600 million just for laundering money for russians in new york, in germany and in cyprus. so that will be a deep focus of mueller s investigation. not surprising in the least that they re working on jared kushner s family first. they may be an easier target and they may be able to get leverage from that. is this in some ways less complicated only in this sense? that you have paper records.
army navy are and marine corps, 36% failure rate and air force a 14% failure rate. talking to the lawyers. what this suit wants to do force the definite of defense to follow the law. seeking a court injunction if they don t follow the law, and seeking a preliminary injunction and hope to have something here pretty soon. hans, i don t understand. the military is a a body that works on systems and procedures. this is entirely a systems and procedures problem. this isn t an attitude natural problem or culture shift. inform the fbi and put it in their database. how can this still be a problem in the 1990s? reporter: it wasn t systemwide. they have different procedures switching from paper records to electronic records and also has to do on the base where this court-martial took place. when they actually discharge an individual from the military, get dishonable discharge, it s