Soon as possible. We need to help israel and get the appropriations process movements so the key elements are funded in the right way and get back to our Committee Work and frankly we need to continue the oversight work that i think is so darn important. Jim jordan failed to get through in two votes to become House Speaker. Taking a run at number three today. Struggling to win over two dozen republican holdouts. It could hold a third vote as early as this morning. Well follow that live as it happens. First. [explosions] rockets over gaza as israel prepares to pull the trigger on a full scale Ground Invasion. As we come on the air with tensions high in the region we see smoke rising on the israel lebanon border. Problems to the north as well. Im shannon bream. Bill and dana are off. Were here. Gillian im Gillian Turner and this is americas newsroom. Israel telling troops to be ready for a Ground Assault on gaza. No timetable on the deployment. Israel continues to scorch hamas Terror Tar
Lets catch up on what the market has done overnight. The big issue is oil, back in the bear market. It is currently down 20 off its highback in june, when we reached the high. Clearly, china is weighing into that once more with concerns about too much supply and where demand goes when you have the pmi coming out of china. If missed every single economists forecast. We saw doing even worse than had been expected. I will also bring you uptodate with some of the market moves we saw in terms of closing on the equity market. The commodities that is feeding into the market, the s p 500 off by nearly a half a percent. Meanwhile, the european stoxx 600 is off. They have been slumping for three days in a row. That brings us to our twitter question of the day. Let us know how much further does the commodities route have to go . Tweet me. I want to know your thoughts and what you think good oil go even further than a 20 decline . Of course it was disappointing in china when preliminary pmi fell t
This laws impact on managing our nations fisheries, its successes to date and possibly areas of improvement. The committee has already announced a field hearing in alaska later this month and i look forward to hearing from stakeholders at additional hearings throughout the country this fall. I would like to first welcome both of our witnesses, dr. John quinn, the chair of the Council Coordination committee, the ccc, and mr. Chris oliver, noaas assistant administrator for fisheries. The last reauthorization of msa was 11 years ago and it created the ccc. The ccc has the leadership of eight Regional Councils to discuss areas of common interest and im pleased to have dr. Quinn here today to discuss consensus views of the eight counsels on the msa reauthorization. Im also pleased to introduce chris oliver, firstever alaska on the hold the position of the assistant administrator for fisheries before becoming director, chris spent 27 years working at the North Pacific Fisheries Management co
Korea . Mark, as you know well, if you look at our two alliances particularly in northeast asia, japan, and north and south korea, they are the most generous providers of countries that we station troops in. Those negotiations are always difficult. I would say with japan its about 5 billion. Korea less. Obviously much smaller country. Smaller footprint. I would say that the calculus by which these decisions and agreements are examined has to be looked in a more holistic way. I believe the four deployment of our forces in asia is a multiplier for the United States. We do not necessarily do this to protect and serve our allies. It integrates us in a way that frankly puts feet and boots and sailors on the ground and in the water in a manner that serves the Strategic Interests of the United States. So i think applying a very narrow green eye shade calculus of the kind mr. Trump has suggested i do not believe is in the best strategic interest of the United States, and it misses the entire r
Korea . Mark, as you know well, if you look at our two alliances particularly in northeast asia, japan, and north and south korea, they are the most generous providers of countries that we station troops in. Those negotiations are always difficult. I would say with japan its about 5 billion. Korea less. Obviously much smaller country. Smaller footprint. I would say that the calculus by which these decisions and agreements are examined has to be looked in a more holistic way. I believe the four deployment of our forces in asia is a multiplier for the United States. We do not necessarily do this to protect and serve our allies. It integrates us in a way that frankly puts feet and boots and sailors on the ground and in the water in a manner that serves the Strategic Interests of the United States. So i think applying a very narrow green eye shade calculus of the kind mr. Trump has suggested i do not believe is in the best strategic interest of the United States, and it misses the entire r