offering a number of big opinions, she has been very pointed and her criticisms on the losing end. she has had very strong majority opinions, and we think of her as one of the newer justices, but she has had several years on the bench. three justices who are more junior to her. she is taking on more of a voice and maybe the next wave. they are getting older and can t serve forever. there is a lot of focus on her. she has really pushed back on several things. she has pushback on the idea that the court would overrule presidents, and a lot of people think that she and justice breyer have said that this court has become uncomfortable with overturning precedents, simply because they don t like the way that it was done years ago. she seems to be sending warning signals, saying our very system is at stake. that is what this court should
versus wade because he assured her he respects precedent. i would i is a justice gore such told her he would respect precedent but voted against precedent this week with a janice case, if anything, this president, this administration is all about overturning precedents. and i don t think that a president should be able to appoint someone who could potentially sit on a case and decide a case against that sitting president. i think that we should wait and let the american people have their say and let s get through the election with just four months away and that s not a long time. then let s take a look at these nominees. there are obviously a lot of democrats from red states, states that trump won who are up for re-election this year. there s going to be a lot of pressure on them, heitcamp and manchin from weapon weapst virg. should they vote the way that they need to vote to win
are you going to ask your nominees beforehand how they might vote on roe v. wade? that s a big one, and probably not. they re all saying don t do that. you don t do that. you shouldn t do that. but i m putting conservative people on. this president, this administration, is all about overturning precedents. i would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to roe v. wade because that would mean, to me, that their judicial philosophy did not include a respect for established decisions. roe v. wade and many different ways has been affirmed over the years. i think that my colleagues on both sides of the aisle know that this vote could be a one of the key votes of their entire career. the roe v. wade, you know, is probably the one that people are talking about in terms of having an effect, but we ll see what happens, but it could very well end up with states at some po t