massive state of denial, and so all the energy now is around saying that this was, you know, a setup. yeah. all the various things that he s said. but i think he is sitting in a state that really tests whatever level of mental health he currently has. hmm. yeah, and that is a type of stress and strain. he said in his bizarre press conference afterward, he said, you know, other people would have stepped back by now. he s wired different. and i thought, that s one of those time where is he s saying something that corresponds to reality. yeah. he s wired up is what he means. he s activated and he s crazed. if you look at the last month or even the last two month, he s gone further and further out in terms of outrageousness, you know? yeah. posting in a way that
the first is those do work in tandem because what you have is donald trump saying i will do anything which is like outrageous out to here. then you have the techno crats who say we will only go this far. so he sets outer bounds of outrageousness and they set a bounds that would have been outrageous unto itself but seems quite within the bounds of normal given that they re not, you know, insurrection. on the trump sentencing i want to add one thing. i think the judge will be smart and i think he will ignore the attacks. he is not going to say because you attacked the judge, i am going to increase your sentence. i think this is where contempt citations will come back into play and attacks on the judicial system as a whole. the judge is there to uphold rule of law and see whether he is remorseful of his cop duct. he will take the things donald trump that violated gag orders,
If when it comes along the constitution they really dont have a substantive position. That is not the case in front of this court. The case in front of this court is a former president who made decisions that he believed were legal. A former president who was impeached but found innocent. A former president who has been subjected and targeted by the existing administration at the urging of Joe Biden. Or after Joe Biden made those demands both in the New York Times and otherwise theyd dust off a statute in Enron Statute and of federal Statute Charge of that is what is before this court not a sitting president ordering the execution of a candidate opposite her hypothetical underscores the outrageousness of what is going on and yes this is crucially important for so many reasons
If when it comes along the constitution they really dont have a substantive position. That is not the case in front of this court. The case in front of this court is a former president who made decisions that he believed were legal. A former president who was impeached but found innocent. A former president who has been subjected and targeted by the existing administration at the urging of Joe Biden. Or after Joe Biden made those demands both in the New York Times and otherwise theyd dust off a statute in Enron Statute and of federal Statute Charge of that is what is before this court not a sitting president ordering the execution of a candidate opposite her hypothetical underscores the outrageousness of what is going on and yes this is crucially important for so many reasons
If when it comes along the constitution they really dont have a substantive position. That is not the case in front of this court. The case in front of this court is a former president who made decisions that he believed were legal. A former president who was impeached but found innocent. A former president who has been subjected and targeted by the existing administration at the urging of Joe Biden. Or after Joe Biden made those demands both in the New York Times and otherwise theyd dust off a statute in Enron Statute and of federal Statute Charge of that is what is before this court not a sitting president ordering the execution of a candidate opposite her hypothetical underscores the outrageousness of what is going on and yes this is crucially important for so many reasons