Respond if it takes more than 15 minutes to provide the information. Okay. But this is for oral information. Not a record. Thats right. As i mentioned earlier sunshine ordinance does not require the city to create any records. Okay. I understand. If i let him speak am i opening up Public Comment. You can reopen Public Comment. I maybe able to help you on this. No. I understand. It was meant to be a joke. Its not nearly as funny a the 1 0 30. Just to refer you to section 20 b Public Information is defined there as the content of public records in public records act whether provided in documentary form or Oral Communication and doesnt include software. I would perhaps interpret even if mr. Clark wasnt specifically requesting any documents to the extent that there was information contained in a document thats responsive to his inquiry and to the extent this was a single question and not interrogatories that if the department had information in a specific document, if they had records to p
The statement includes responses to mr. Clarks questions. Who ill this Public Information was not released on a timely basis it was nonetheless released to mr. Clark on a responsive basis by virtue of those two hearings. Furthermore after the last of those two hearings, mr. Clark, on august 29, 2011, mr. Clark sent me an email regarding his proposal for the designation of street spaces or hey street. I fully responded to the question on page 2 of the letter to mr. Clark on september 13. You have a copy that have letter before you in this section. While admitting my failure to respond on a timely basis i did respond to mr. Clark thoroughly and on a responsive basis in the two task force hearings related to the subject matter. Then the third Sunshine Task force charge 67. 21 e for failure to send a knowledgeable representative to the task force hearing. I disagree for the following reasons. No. 1, the City Attorney had adviced me that it would be legal for me to send a representative eve
Deals with response must respond for oral information. A. The b the role of that person is to provide information in a helpful and timely way and c, that person does not have to sit down and have a lengthy discussion. I think it does not require to respond if it takes more than 15 minutes to provide the information. Okay. But this is for oral information. Not a record. Thats right. As i mentioned earlier sunshine ordinance does not require the city to create any records. Okay. I understand. If i let him speak am i opening up Public Comment. You can reopen Public Comment. I maybe able to help you on this. No. I understand. It was meant to be a joke. Its not nearly as funny a the 1 0 30. Just to refer you to section 20 b Public Information is defined there as the content of public records in public records act whether provided in documentary form or Oral Communication and doesnt include software. I would perhaps interpret even if mr. Clark wasnt specifically requesting any documents to t
Supervisors meeting it gave him an opportunity to come up with a compromise. They came up with a suggested compromise and the item was put on the call of the chair. I left that meeting while thinking there was something in the works and i waited a year before i contacted mr. Lazar and asked him what was happening. At that time i found out thats when i didnt get any response to him from him, i was asking, whats going on. Have you heard from the valley merchants with regard to this proposal. What happened at that time thats when after i found out all this time later after going through the complaint and that you will stuff, i found out that the answer to my question was no, nothing has ever happened between the Arts Commission and the hayes valley merchants. So all this time i went through all these hearings, mr. Lazar was present at the hearing but left in the middle of the hearing. All he had to do was sent me an email saying nothing has ever happened. As a result of that, i went back
What do we know about this missing plane . Reporter what we know this plane went missing according to state media in Vietnamese Air space, piers, it was due to land here at 6 30 in the morning local time in beijing, this boeing 777 from Malaysian Airlines. Packed with 239 people onboard including 12 crew members and two infants. They are searching frantically for where the plane went down, if it did go down. At this stage very sketchy details. 13 different nationalities on board. The majority on that plane were chinese nationals, around 160 according to Chinese State tv. So a desperate search, Malaysia Airlines has notified or is in the process of notifying the next of kin. And this boeing 777 seems to have vanished at this point. So theres no confirmation the plane has crashed. What are the other possibilities if it hasnt crashed . Reporter well if it hasnt crashed it would have presumably landed at this stage. There would be no indications of any confirmed reports of a plane landing