president to act because it s the right thing to do. same mainstream media at the behind of trouble in iraq argued it was the wrong thing to do. back then we had not given the u.n. enough time. now the u.n. is not worth the time? brent, what has changed sneer changed sneer. it isn t the people reporting the news. it s the world view. it s the president that has changed. it s a remarkable turn of events. it s deja vu all over again except the media are reporting it in the exact opposite way. they saw how saddam hussein as something that didn t merit american intervention. in fact saddam hussein had innovated kuwait and was saber rattling. in the case of assad, as horrific as this is, assad has not invaded anybody. he has not threatened american interests directly and no one is
the transition under stress of how it got into the hand is moot. i ve interviewed numerous police officers involved in shootings and frequently i hear i shot when did you draw? they re not clear on how they got into position. they know they did it. point still remains the gun was in his hand and he discharged it. he did it in way with billowing clothing that was two to four inches away from his chest. if he s moving with the arizona ice tea in his jacket, the hoodie, leaning forward if the body position forward that sea will stay there. if he s linked leaning too far back that tea will be pushing the shirt the opposite direction
i believe it was a culmination of downward force whether from pushing or striking and i know clearly by the injuries to his face and that will drive him back his head striking hard into the concrete. would you expect somebody getting their head struck on the cement would attempt to resist it happening? of course. normal human instinct is to try to move away from the pain stimulus that would create another gap and be driven back. would that occur not only the first time but every subsequent time? whether it s a push or strike every time you drive a strike or push downward the body goes until it hits an object that will stop it. paul said he thought this was a point where the defense might have been losing some steam. danny, i want you to come in and tell me why i m crazy. i actually thought this was a pretty darn good way of recapturing your redirect and making that your moment and your
a 90-degree reference, i want to be clear that the manner with his raising his gun up, i don t know how you could get a 90 degree entry if you re sitting straight back like this. i m not sitting straight back. from my perspective is it looks like you re vertically up right and the two of you form a 90 and if the two of you form a 90 where you re straight up and he brings a gun to bear just based on the dynamics of his arm there wouldn t be a way for it to go straight in. there has to be mutual movement. as if the defendant started to sit up, are you saying there couldn t be a 90-degree angle? am i saying there couldn t be in half up position and you trying to get up? if the bodies become inlined. my understanding to maintain the entry we ll have to maintain some relativity between the two
strikes were being rained down and he was physically incapable of responding, screaming for help. wanting somebody to help him out of a bad situation and maybe he was pushing. i wasn t there so i can t say what his hands were doing. if you re the aggressor in the fight how can you be the aggressor and not hurt somebody. in this situation if he s screaming there s an absence of injury he wasn t the one throwing strikes. desert you i ll stand by you yeaaaah! yeah. so that s our loyalty program. you re automatically enrolled, and the longer you stay, the more rewards you get. great! oh! i ll stand by you won t let nobody hurt you isn t there a simpler way to explain the loyalty program? yes.