And the message is everyone who wants to enroll should and well make sure no one is going to get dropped and we have to stabilize funding and thats the point of this bill. Without the stabilization of funding what happens is what is the known as a visible cycle. Students dont enroll and as a result faculty have to be leadoff and it gets smaller and smaller. Thats why we have to stabilize the funding. The bill makes it relating minor amendment theres a single year of funding stabilization in california statute. For example, in the 20132014 school year the funding level is the aim as 1213. Could leaguer to call 20132014 the base funding but 20142015 well stick with the funding and going into 20152016 the funding will be no less than that 75 percent and then 90 percent and the last year out will be in the morning that 85 percent. I say, no less than its our hope as we get to the outer years reinforcement will be on the rise but its a safety net a basin so we can work to restore enrollment
Of San Francisco for its accreditation. City college i dont need to reaccount its on the only portal for hire education and for workforce training. Its also one of San Franciscos largest employers and a Great Customer to San Franciscos small businesses. We must sustain our San Francisco city college. The news is good the chancellor is well aware of what needs to be accomplished to save this month important campus and district of the one hundred and 12 if i can be bold. So he has every incentive and im consist it will get down. In spite of the of the good news and the progress were making that there are some who would otherwise enroll in San Francisco who are not. We have to make sure we do that weve lost 16 percent of enforcement. To positive expectation accreditation will be sustained and the message is everyone who wants to enroll should and well make sure no one is going to get dropped and we have to stabilize funding and thats the point of this bill. Without the stabilization of fu
Make sure no one is going to get dropped and we have to stabilize funding and thats the point of this bill. Without the stabilization of funding what happens is what is the known as a visible cycle. Students dont enroll and as a result faculty have to be leadoff and it gets smaller and smaller. Thats why we have to stabilize the funding. The bill makes it relating minor amendment theres a single year of funding stabilization in california statute. For example, in the 20132014 school year the funding level is the aim as 1213. Could leaguer to call 20132014 the base funding but 20142015 well stick with the funding and going into 20152016 the funding will be no less than that 75 percent and then 90 percent and the last year out will be in the morning that 85 percent. I say, no less than its our hope as we get to the outer years reinforcement will be on the rise but its a safety net a basin so we can work to restore enrollment and all through the process of sustaining accreditation. What w
District of the one hundred and 12 if i can be bold. So he has every incentive and im consist it will get down. In spite of the of the good news and the progress were making that there are some who would otherwise enroll in San Francisco who are not. We have to make sure we do that weve lost 16 percent of enforcement. To positive expectation accreditation will be sustained and the message is everyone who wants to enroll should and well make sure no one is going to get dropped and we have to stabilize funding and thats the point of this bill. Without the stabilization of funding what happens is what is the known as a visible cycle. Students dont enroll and as a result faculty have to be leadoff and it gets smaller and smaller. Thats why we have to stabilize the funding. The bill makes it relating minor amendment theres a single year of funding stabilization in california statute. For example, in the 20132014 school year the funding level is the aim as 1213. Could leaguer to call 2013201
Otherwise enroll in San Francisco who are not. We have to make sure we do that weve lost 16 percent of enforcement. To positive expectation accreditation will be sustained and the message is everyone who wants to enroll should and well make sure no one is going to get dropped and we have to stabilize funding and thats the point of this bill. Without the stabilization of funding what happens is what is the known as a visible cycle. Students dont enroll and as a result faculty have to be leadoff and it gets smaller and smaller. Thats why we have to stabilize the funding. The bill makes it relating minor amendment theres a single year of funding stabilization in california statute. For example, in the 20132014 school year the funding level is the aim as 1213. Could leaguer to call 20132014 the base funding but 20142015 well stick with the funding and going into 20152016 the funding will be no less than that 75 percent and then 90 percent and the last year out will be in the morning that 8