Now. But i want to focus on then. And see if we can get some insight into lincoln and his times and this, as guy said, this hot topic. Let me start with december 6, 1864. Thats just a month after his reelection as president. And its the day that Abraham Lincoln sent his fourth and as fate would have it, his final annual message to congress. The equivalent, as you know of todays state of the union messages, except by the tradition of the lincoln era, they are not orated in person. They were sent Via White House staff and read by a clerk. Maybe with feeling. Probably not. Certainly not the way lincoln himself would have read it. So we can only imagine how the document was received by a body that would ultimately just take a reading copy and study it more closely. I would think that one passage, particularly, caught the listeners attention that day. And keep in mind as we set the stage, not only had lincoln recently been reelected, but the civil war had been raging for three and a half ye
Now. But i want to focus on then. And see if we can get some insight into lincoln and his times and this, as guy said, this hot topic. Let me start with december 6, 1864. Thats just a month after his reelection as president. And its the day that Abraham Lincoln sent his fourth and as fate would have it, his final annual message to congress. The equivalent, as you know of todays state of the union messages, except by the tradition of the lincoln era, they are not orated in person. They were sent Via White House staff and read by a clerk. Maybe with feeling. Probably not. Certainly not the way lincoln himself would have read it. So we can only imagine how the document was received by a body that would ultimately just take a reading copy and study it more closely. I would think that one passage, particularly, caught the listeners attention that day. And keep in mind as we set the stage, not only had lincoln recently been reelected, but the civil war had been raging for three and a half ye
To revisit and see if we can semester the possibility of putting praits costs back in so it will be same thing the tdif can be spent on operating i have a number of amendments colleagues that id like to offer to the tsf legislation but for one think that the extra 2 for projects over one thousand square feet are sustainable is financially not stop housing thats been expressed in the Economic Feasibility study and quite frankly that was done in 2012 with the discussion began and i realize a lot of work has been done by any colleagues and the legislatively branch and the other agencies but well have that 30 million youve seen in our pocket now. Thank you. Thank you supervisor avalos. Thank you well, this is actually, i worked on multiple methods of raising money for muni this is not the only way im trying to raise money for money as supervisor wiener indicated and ill again echo my comments and, of course, supervisor peskin comments these fees we fell short of the kleenex of those fees b
Fee for nonresidential and pdr projects filed before july 24th to pay it with the partial rotunda. Supervisor alavos will be leading the discussion. Good it you this is hopefully, the culmination of years of work moving this item out of committee we the item before you amendments made to the Transportation Sustainability fee we made them in december of last year these railroad also an amendment ive attempted to make in the fall of last year before i begin i want to thank the Planning Department and the mta. All of their work developing these new fee structures for Development San Francisco they are significant improvement on the previous tdif and include the retain that had not been impacted but now in the tdif so to make that clear the proposed fee is not near significant to offset the impacts that the developments have on the Transportation Network and the Economic Feasibility study houses shows it sport a higher fee without the feasibility of the projects this ordinance has made two
So there is some things we need to decide to figure out how were Going Forward the short answer we have at the end of the year last year, we had identified a couple of specific items that we had identified as risks the biggest ones were the reduction the capitated rate for medical expansion population and this is about 167 167 million and an associated i g t that rates had been going to i pack we had the fund retired were drawing them out in fiscal year 20162017 to cover that shortfall in fiscal year 20172018 we are doing a similar were taking a similar approach to draw fund reserved but we anticipate is that well be doing that in a one time basis and then resolving the issues that are underlying the needs to draw from reserves the budget Going Forward so really not be independent on drawing from the reserve year after year were trying to use it as a way to capture on things unforeseeable and clean up things Going Forward in the budget and i think your suths e suggesting we want the re