In ten days defects. So why some labour long faces . Just as rishi sunak tries to gee up his mps, another one bites the dust, and heads for the Labour Benches citing housing and immigration. Tory mp neil obrien will be here to tell us the big problem is legal migration. Our other guests might not agree. Also tonight. Inside the afd. We investigate if germanys far right alternative for Deutschland Party have a neo nazi problem. You could call me a nazi as well, because i want to defend my own country. I dont know whats wrong with it. But you mean youre comfortable with that . Im comfortable with the programme we are fighting for, yes. As the Home Secretary expels the Russian Defence attache, and the National Crime agency exposes an alleged top russian ransomware boss, just how cold is the new cold war going to get . The nca is here, along with our former Defence Attache to russia. Good evening. Today rishi sunak tried to press the reset button after last weeks local election rout with a
97% of burning uv rays. it s light, but it s working hard like me, neutrogena ultras yourself on screen. i m zachary cohen and washington. and this is cnn hello and welcome to cnn special coverage of the closing arguments in former president donald trump s criminal hush money trial. i m wolf blitzer in washington alongside abby phillip, who s outside the courthouse in new york a very consequential de, as we enter the home stretch of this truly historic trial korda s out now for lunch following a morning of blistering closing arguments by trump s defense team on surprisingly, trump attorney todd blanche made the case that payments made to michel cone the heart of the prosecution s charges were not illegal abbe over to you that s right. well, a blanche ripped into potential pivotal testimony delivered by trump s former fixer and personal attorney repeatedly calling michael cohen a liar, whose words should not be trusted, and the claims that the alleged tryst between trump
objected because it is the coronation we ob ected. , , ., because it is the coronation we ob ected. , , objected. this is a problem with eo - le in objected. this is a problem with people in britain objected. this is a problem with people in britain today, - objected. this is a problem with people in britain today, alwaysl people in britain today, always trying to destroy anything that is great for britain or anything we try to showcase in britain. the coronation to showcase in britain. the coronation is to showcase in britain. the coronation is trying - to showcase in britain. the coronation is trying to - to showcase in britain. the coronation is trying to destroy our denrocracy coronation is trying to destroy our denrocracy the coronation is trying to destroy our democracy. the free, coronation is trying to destroy our democracy. the free, the - coronation is trying to destroy our democracy. the free, the police . coronation is trying to destroy our i democracy. the fr
this is different, this is what is called at least asserting executive privilege somehow that being a former president his papers or documents are things cannot be made available to other areas of the government. it s an odd argument. needless to say, even if he had a point here, and even if you are correct on this executive privilege point, the justice department has had this document since august 8th. they have been filing them, collating, them whatever maybe. any request for some other party to come in and start segregating documents and taking them apart is moot, because the justice already has access to them. it does appear like this is at best an attempt to delay and slow down the proceedings. we also heard from trump s lawyer speaking to fox news on issues they have with the department of justice. here he is.
that just came out, biden is presiding over a debacle entirely of his own making in afghanistan, one that has unfolded more swiftly than even the most dire prognostications. peter, to some extent, though, hasn t this debacle been in the making for years? well, this is kind of a version of the white house argument which is, the brilliance of biden s decision is simply underlined by the collapse of the afghan government and the military, right? you re hearing that from the white house. we are. it s a kind of odd argument, and i think it was an avoidable debacle and fiasco. in the previous segment you were talking with kim dozier about the comparisons with saigon in 75. let s fast-forward a couple of decades and compare to kabul in 1996 when the taliban took over. let s use that as potentially a benchmark of what s going to happen next. you know, they banned music. they had their own radio station. the only thing on the radio