Qu quote, Deutsch Banks takes its legal obligations seriously. Heres an interview with the New York Times a couple of months ago, answering questions as to whether his businesses and finances were fair gain. If mueller was looking at your finances and your Family Finances unrelated to russia, is that a red line . I would say yes. Lets get to all of this with our reporters and guests, White House Bureau chief phil rucker, with me on set, National Security reporter ken delaney. And chuck rosenberg, a former u. S. Attorney who worked on the staff of Robert Mueller and James Comb Koecomey of the fbi. Let me start with those financial headlines. Theres a dispute about the facts, but would you surmise that Donald Trumps taxes are something that bob mueller either has or will seek to
which the president and james comey have very different accounts of what happened there. And finally to the Deutsch Bank Discussion that youre having. Jay sekulow is another one of the president s outside counsel
and the other one is obstructio obstruction. katie: i think the only taxpayer dollars here are being wasted on another investigation. jerry nadler is actually lying saying they re going to go past the four corners of the mueller report. not true. he is actually sending out fund-raisers email saying impeachment inquiry is open. they are being dishonest and wasting taxpayer money. greg: impeachment is what you get when you have, you are living in a great time and suffering from amnesia. i wasn t here yesterday for 9/1 9/11. it s 9/12 and they re not thinking about how to prevent a nine they are thinking about impeachment. that s a crime. at least we know what trump is doing about terror. if this happens again we also know what the democrats were doing. they were doing this and that s a shame. juan: okay, biden scam criticizes the media. elizabeth warren criticized as being a hypocrite and that is
greg: thanks, john. dana, nothing here about obstruction. this is about whatever. dana: what the president decided to answer, questions on collusion and not on obstructio obstruction. for mueller, that might be enough. i don t know. it will never be enough in the eyes of the media or for the democrats were about to take over the house. so while this is a great way to try to get this off your plate before thanksgiving so the president of the first lady can have a thanksgiving where they hopefully don t have to talk about this, that s what they are thinking. but this is starting to wrap up. mueller is going to sentence or going to move forward with the sentencing hearing on december 4 of mike flynn. there will be more information around that. i think after thanksgiving while there is a lame duck session with her group owing to try to get a two things done, confirm some judges, and the congress. there s going to be activity in the mueller investigation namibia does wrap up by christma
by the way that mccabe was behaving in the room. sad, what do you want me to do? do you want me to wear a wire? something along those lines. jonathan, when you think about that, and the tension of the moment with james comey not being fired days before, the activity in the room, what does it say to you? what it says it s a matter of interpretation, that interpretation could have considerable consequences. i have a column in the hill today talking about how trump could use this as a way to fulfill what he s wanted for a long time. not only to replace rosenstein but also replace sessions. he could say this is a case of insubordination, not obstructio obstruction. go ahead and fire rosenstein and replace him potentially with a person he wants to become ultimately attorney general. if you follow that course, he would end up with an attorney general who had direct
well, i m not on the committee, but talking to people around the president, what they re worried about more than anything else is the obstruction of justice case. neb they say, oh, it s a flimsy case. he didn t know what he was doing. he didn t mean to obstruct justice. that s the things they tell themselves. but that is where the fear is among those defending the president and close to the president. but would that be enough to move to the middle in the congress? obstructio obstruction? it would have to be collusion. honestly, right now, chris, i just i don t see it. remember, you ve got to gate two-thirds vote of the senate. two-thirds vote of the senate. how about getting a majority in the house? you know if you take the house this november? then it s possible. i think that s possible. but, you know, you ve still got to go get two-thirds of the senate and that will still be a big mountain to climb. now, i am hopeful for some of these republicans that after they get