Secondary sanctions on foreign entities doing businesses with entities remain listed with terrorism and human rights issues. The problem is the laudable positions have not been made public and they are only effective if they are aggressively publicized and equally enforced. The fact is as u. S. Officials will concede in private conversations that the administration suffers from a trust deficit. Whether one believes this is deserved or not. It is there. And the fact is that not only are none of the positions listed just listed clear within the deal, the deal could easily be read as prohibiting each and every one of them. Failing to make these positions public not only undermines the utility, it makes people question whether the administrations intention is to act on those positions moving forward. Those are Critical Issues not open to interpretation under the iran deal. The task force issued the last statement identifying iran with a region which poses risk to the Financial System. They
It doesnt take much money to put on the table no disrespect to get president s interested in changing their ways. Im impressed with the focus you have had bringing in low income students. Is there a way to do it that does not discourage schools from reaching out and taking at risk students . That is often the critique you are going to make it less likely that you have low income, at risk students and you get punished for longer graduation times. Is there a way that risk adjusts for schools reaching out to these populations . Absolutely. We should incentivize universities to do what is right and what works and we are not doing enough of that. Idea that we would put great emphasis upon rating schools based on income levels after graduation is inherently problematic coming given the rest are dichter of a student income is their Family Income before they enroll in the first place. To do is find ways to reward institutions and reward students who are making a difference against the odds. Cu
It doesnt take much money to put on the table no disrespect to get president s interested in changing their ways. Im impressed with the focus you have had bringing in low income students. Is there a way to do it that does not discourage schools from reaching out and taking at risk students . That is often the critique you are going to make it less likely that you have low income, at risk students and you get punished for longer graduation times. Is there a way that risk adjusts for schools reaching out to these populations . Absolutely. We should incentivize universities to do what is right and what works and we are not doing enough of that. Idea that we would put great emphasis upon rating schools based on income levels after graduation is inherently problematic coming given the rest are dichter of a student income is their Family Income before they enroll in the first place. To do is find ways to reward institutions and reward students who are making a difference against the odds. Cu
It doesnt take much money to put on the table no disrespect to get president s interested in changing their ways. Im impressed with the focus you have had bringing in low income students. Is there a way to do it that does not discourage schools from reaching out and taking at risk students . That is often the critique you are going to make it less likely that you have low income, at risk students and you get punished for longer graduation times. Is there a way that risk adjusts for schools reaching out to these populations . Absolutely. We should incentivize universities to do what is right and what works and we are not doing enough of that. Idea that we would put great emphasis upon rating schools based on income levels after graduation is inherently problematic coming given the rest are dichter of a student income is their Family Income before they enroll in the first place. To do is find ways to reward institutions and reward students who are making a difference against the odds. Cu
It doesnt take much money to put on the table no disrespect to get president s interested in changing their ways. Im impressed with the focus you have had bringing in low income students. Is there a way to do it that does not discourage schools from reaching out and taking at risk students . That is often the critique you are going to make it less likely that you have low income, at risk students and you get punished for longer graduation times. Is there a way that risk adjusts for schools reaching out to these populations . Absolutely. We should incentivize universities to do what is right and what works and we are not doing enough of that. Idea that we would put great emphasis upon rating schools based on income levels after graduation is inherently problematic coming given the rest are dichter of a student income is their Family Income before they enroll in the first place. To do is find ways to reward institutions and reward students who are making a difference against the odds. Cu