listen to this. it s number one forever on our countdown. what is this guy talking about? it provides in obama care that this commission and noncommission officer corps will be trained, but i want to know, are they using weapons to train, or are they being taught to use syringes and health care items? joan, what did this army of people bearing syringes doing what are they calling the putting syringes up over their shoulder? what are we talking about? what fear zone is he working here? an army of people like invasion of the body snatchers going around inoculating people with detect panel juice or whatever the hell it is? we have also got a theme here in that we have got three guys, stockman and farntold and gohmert from texas which makes me worry about my friends in texas. these people also believe there are fema camps, that there are
question that many republicans will be asking. it would seem to me that politically it s probably best for the administration to bend over backwards to make sort of appearances of sort of on their face appearances of inappropriateness go away. i m kind of surprised that she stuck around as long as she had given the connection. david hawkins, thank you so much. we appreciate your insight as always this morning. thank you. thank you. eric. the nsa s controversial programs. this morning there s new reaction on it in an exclusive fox news sunday interview, former vice president dick cheney tells chris wallace what he thinks. on behalf of the noncommission officers and soldiers from brandenberg, kentucky, we would like to send out this father s day salute. happy father s day! [ kitt ] you know what s impressive?
doing training. you get at this problem by training investigators, getting victim advocates, creating an environment where victims feel safe about coming forward, going after people who retaliate against victims, and putting these people in prison. why would a commanding officer, say middle level officer, major, why would a major or colonel put up with what he knew to be sexual abuse? criminal actions. wouldn t that destroy the morale of the women serving as commission, noncommission, and as enlisted people? wouldn t that ruin the whole spree of the operation to have it known that women are not protected by their superior officers from this horrible stuff? well, don t get me wrong. i think most commanders, they want to get these cowards and they want to get them out. the question is, do they view this as a problem to get rid of or do they view this as a mission to prosecute the predators who have joined the military. i think too often it s probably the first rather than the latter.
the information under the large title of unwanted sexual conduct, they could get at the problem. that was part of their wrongheaded thinking on this. you don t get at this problem by doing training. you get at this problem by training investigators, getting victim advocates, creating an environment where victims feel safe about coming forward, going after people who retaliate against victims, and putting these people in prison. why would a commander officer, say a middle-level officer, major, why would a major or colonel put up with what he knew to be sexual abuse? criminal action. wouldn t that destroy the morale of the women serving as commission, noncommission, and as enlisted people? wouldn t that ruin the whole spree of the operation to have it known that women are not protected by their superior officers from this horrible stuff? don t get me wrong. i think most commanders, they want to get these cowards and they want to get them out. the question is, do they view
dempsey said today 15 years ago they thought if they captured the information under the large title of unwanted sexual contact, they could get at the problem. but that was part of their wrongheaded thinking on this. you don t get at this problem by doing training. you get at this problem by training investigators, getting victim advocates, creating an environment where victims feel safe about coming forward, going after people who retaliate against victims, and putting these people in prison. why would a commanding officer, say middle level officer, major, why would a major or colonel put up with what he knew to be sexual abuse? criminal actions. wouldn t that destroy the morale of the women serving as commission, noncommission, and as enlisted people? wouldn t that ruin the whole spree of the operation to have it known that women are not protected by their superior officers from this horrible stuff?