sessions and attorney general and taking his place. was there any truth to that? earlier this year, i guess earlier this year, everything gets a blur here at this white house, earlier this year, there were rumors that the president was going to get rid of jeff sessions. and appoint scott pruitt as attorney general. this was chatter among the folks here that that rumor was coming out of scott pruitt s office. last week when the news hit that he had personally asked the president in a meeting to fire sessions and appoint him, i reached out to administrator pruitt and he told me it s 1 hn% false story. this was a couple of days ago. he never had that meeting with the president, he supported jeff sessions and wasn t trying to pull the rug out from underneath him. neil, it s just, you know, when you have 14 different investigations against you, it s difficult to survive in any government knob. neil: right, john roberts, thank you. we will have more updates and
protection about the president s children. i think the american people deserve a fair, open, honest accounting of what happened. and after tonight it s clear that multiple people are lying. we already knew that in some sense. it s hard to trust any of this. and i think the circus is in full force and, you know, let s hope that bob mueller is as talented as it appears. jeremy, i d love to be with you tomorrow when you make your calls. and i m wondering about how republicans, prominent or not, are going to process just the post-5:00 p.m. news cycle tonight. post-10:00 p.m. news cycle tonight, brian, really. yeah. i was dozing off when this news hit, my pre the 11th hour nap. in an effort not to be disposable to you.
tonight, brian. yeah, you re right. i was dozing off when this news hit in my pre 11th hour nap, in an effort not to be disposable to you. i do think, in all seriousness, what you have, once again, is a white house that can t get its story straight. one of the white house deputy press secretaries went on fox news shortly after rudy s comments and said, we didn t know he was going to say that. then, you have rudy apparently telling bob costa of the washington post , no, the president authorized this, it was all perfectly fine. while they try to get their stories straight, republicans on capitol hill and in the white house and all across the country who have made it their party line to defend this president at almost any cost, you know, let s not forget, the republican party s days have become less about any particular ideology or
we already knew that in some sense. it s hard to trust any of this. and i think the circus is in full force and, you know, let s hope that bob mueller is as talented as it appears. jeremy, i d love to be with you tomorrow when you make your calls. and i m wondering about how republicans, prominent or not, are going to process just the post-5:00 p.m. news cycle tonight. post-10:00 p.m. news cycle tonight, brian, really. yeah. i was dozing off when this news hit, my pre the 11th hour nap. in an effort not to be disposable to you. no, but i do think, in all seriousness, what you have, once again, is a white house that can t get its story straight. one of the white house deputy press secretaries went on fox news shortly after rudy s
do a triage. does this look like something of reasonable suspicion? it did not happen. the system was set up we should have responded. i can tell you how pained being in florida on friday and getting that news hit us by a gut punch. innerconnectivity needs to happen. when you have police responding to a residence 39 times, that is now from a red flag to a full one. do you devote resources to keep an eye on that person? if i can ask, who should be held responsible? sure. the first point shows 330 million americans. 1 million sworn law enforcement officers. when you think about it. it is impossible. unless we want to live in a police state. in the united states, we cherish