I think the message you have to send out is that it is unacceptable to push a Match Official. We all want to communicate with players and Build Bridges and harmony but theyre still has to be a little distance of authority. A little bit like if i go out walking i cannot push a policeman. It is unacceptable. I felt a little push a policeman. It is unacceptable. Ifelt a little bit sorry for another being sent off, it was a bit unlucky. The second one, i am not sure whether if a player hits the ground in the penalty area it is either a penalty or a dive. The reason is that option and that is to do nothing and in that situation, if the referee had done nothing i do not think anybody would have complained. That said, once he has taken that course of action, he sent him off, there is nothing to excuse what ronaldo did. I can understand the ban but i would not understand if the ban was overturned because the message that would send out is that it the message that would send out is thatitis the
Promised to help. During the campaign, President Elect trump put out a list of promises. He put out his contract for American Voter and in it, very specific promises for his first 100 days. Lowering taxes and tax reform. Free and fair trade deals to protect American Workers and their jobs. Fixing our nations infrastructure and sending education back to the states and school choice. Repealing and replacing obamacare. Affordable child care, pulling a border wall, keeping community safe, rebuilding our nations military and doing what he calld draining the swamp. If he can keep those promises come of this country will be in a much better place one year from now, two years from now, four years from now. So on the eve of this inauguration, my advice for the incoming president is very simple. Dont let the washington establishment, republican establishment, democratic establishment, Media Establishment that in the way of
but i think we will get there and i think this very much is a new beginni
Put what on the president . This idea that you just said the the New York Times is reporting that the president approved either wrote or approved the that is not an outlandish suggesting. I take the the New York Times reporting on its face and why wouldnt a father thats president of the United States want to have a say in what his son was putting out that involves him and his presidency. Seems like a legitimate thing thats why i asked. 39yearold son whose running the Trump Corporation and the trump organization, so he doesnt need to be looked over the shoulder by his father. Heres what i think we need to really focus on and obviously i appreciate you having me on. I need to be clear about three things here. Number one, the president was not aware of the meeting, did not attend the meeting and was only made aware of the emails very recently by counsel and not seen the emails. In fact, you know, i didnt see the email until yesterday and im one of the lawyers. So there you have it. Okay.
Exwives and exgirlfriend. How does the fbi fit into that. We just learned some very interesting if not completely clear information from the head of the fbi director. I want to bring in chris cillizza, who is here with me to discuss this. There is a lot to unpack here from Russian Meddling in the election and how that feaffects the midterms coming up. The timeline had it comes to rob porter, you know what, pause for a moment, chris, lets return to the testimony at the Senate Intelligence committee. Theyre out in the community, and i can tell you the Community Values what they do on the island. Thank you. And an oped by a number of former intelligence analysts call the nunes memo and the release, quote, one of the worst cases of politization of intelligence in modern american history, unquote. You said you had concerns about that memo. I know you cant get into the
sure i stay on the unclassified side. We have seen intentions to have an impact on the next election cycle here. Director co
A talk show focusing on government, politics and the impact of the populist movement in the U. S. And around the world. Because it got so big, google is not just useful but dangerous. It is a leading force for elitism and globalism. It is globalism that businesses have no loyalty to their home country. Most corporations america really is googles home. Did you know google got started, thanks to a program run by the u. S. Government . Google would not exist if it was not for american taxpayers. Google once said that its mission was to organize the worlds information and make it universally accessible. Now, they have floated off in a giant balloon of arrogance. Untethered to any notion of loyalty or ethics. Google is helping americas number one enemy, the evil communist dictatorship in china to depress its own people. The exact opposite of what google once duke four. Google has built in Artificial Intelligence interest in beijing. Even though the chinese regime is openly saying it will us