that he has been exposed as a nay sayer. he is a democratic sheriff in a mostly democratic county. i asked what s the first thing he would say? he said he would say it s a waste of money. more money should be used for the the sheriff s office and equipment for the sheriff s office and border patrol. we d like to hear from different viewpoints. that is one. on the other end is former arizona sheriff paul babeu who joins us. what do you make of that and what s your opinion? well, our border patrol heroes are well trained and well equipped. they re undermined, not only by current law with immigration, but the fact that those numbers preelection to trump, those numbers are returning. we saw 70, almost 80% decrease
data. unless you see the underlying data, you won t understand the summary. he is also saying the american people won t understanding it. that is insulting. the american people are entitled know what has been done in our name, what people to whom we have given power. steve: during the obama administration. correct. what people to whom we have given power have done with that power. we have an absolute right to know that. ainsley: it s only four pages. yes. ainsley: if we doesn t understand it that s why we have experts like you come on and tell us. i haven t seen it i m dying to see it the intelligence committee sat on it while the congress reauthorized and expanded fisa. the reps of the congress should have been informed about what was in here so there could have been a meaningful debate. are we giving more power to the same people that have abused that power in the past? brian: i will be the nay sayer you say skunk at the garden party. they say devin nunes wrote. this how do we
facing as a country? brian: i wants judge andrew napolitano to weigh in. judge? we know this is legal. we know it s been upheld by the supreme court. and the vast majority of these people that come here, through this system, come to join family members that are here. here s the issue. does the government drop the ball when it comes to vetting these people? just because they get to move up online because they have relatives here, does not relieve the government of the obligation to vet them no matter which country they come from. we ll don t know yet if this guy was vetted. if he was vetted and found nothing wrong. if he wasn t vetted at all just because he had relatives here. then the government has in the obama administration seriously dropped the ball and jeopardized public safety. ainsley: for the last 10 years we have .3 million new immigrants that have come through this many is. i night sound like a nay sayer. how do we vet 9.3 million over a 10 year period? we do.
about this merit-based system as opposed to the diversity system, kind of an open lottery. wouldn t it be better to get people who have certain skills that we know would help our economy? you bet, david. we should have a merit system. a point scale with points awarded for being willing to work really, really hard or having advanced degrees and under my points system, people from mexico and china would get high scores. and rich, we know that this merit-based system works in other countries, we ve seen it in australia and elsewhere. yeah, and canada. by the way, donald trump, before he was president, debated steve bannon on this issue on bannon s radio show and trump made the strong persuasive case for me t merit-based immigration and trump needs to go back, he won that debate. david: john, you re a nay sayer. you haven t convinced me the federal government wouldn t know what we should import and
opinion of him. he decided, instead of taking the high road like john mccain did, he said i m saddened by the comments made by someone who i respect and greatly respect. the end. why couldn t donald trump just say the same thing? because he s a businessman who doesn t back down. but that s not a quality that you hold on, hold on, back you down to what? if a congressman calls him out, he s not just going to take it. why is that necessary? you know how many things he has to multi-task, and he s worried about what a congressman thinks? he s also tweeting about hillary clinton losing to him. so it s not just about him being a businessman who doesn t back down. it s about him being an ego maniacal person who says things about any nay sayer. it goes back to the fact that i thinks there s no one more