Material and troops were sent in there. For some reason will send them in and invited 70,000 japanese troops in. There is a concern given russias respect for history or maybe not respect, or an awareness that things like this. I could see that being an additional driving force in concern for protecting the arctic. For the most part, the airbases are airstrips are just not overly threatening. As i understand it except for submarines has been no ice capable naval ship. There is construction of coast guard ships but those are not armed like on National Security. So to me it still looks like a domestic approach to the arctic, not and outward looking, but a local defense activity. So i just throw that out as important because when we say military, we think aggression. When we say coast guard, we think that sun. As i look at it, i see much more of that. Once you get away from where they have submarine in the strategic issue. If you could talk about how russia really perceives that and whethe
Representative massie, who is a tea party republican, who stands first and foremost for localism, would forget those principles when it came to the District Of Columbia. And try to interfere with local matters in this city. We had the same thing happen to another colleague, a republican from maryland, who should have known better, who has a particular distaste for the decriminalization of marijuana laws that is going on all over the United States, 18 states so far, legalization in two states. So he tries to get a law, indeed got a law that we now have kept from getting through block te, that would the districts recently passed marijuana decriminalization law. What this means is that there a ld be a fine rather than conviction for possessing marijuana. The district didnt do it by the way for the reasons that some states, the 1 states, perhaps some of them 18 states, perhaps some of them did it. Although some of them may have done it for the same reason we did it. Blacks and white use ma
Put another level of protection there. I want you to do to hops until theres a connection. We are not authorized now to follow the string as we used to be able to do. In terms of the metadata of those are probably the biggest changes we have dealt with. In addition we have provided broad guidance in the form of an unclassified document that the government has generated which in a very public unclassified way outlines the general principles we want to make sure we apply in conducting intelligence at the nsa so we are putting those principles in place. In addition we have completed over the course of the last 15 months or so a fundamental review of everything that nsa does and what we collect against. That has all been reviewed to ensure we are comfortable from a policy perspective and what we are doing. Basically what the admiral said is in erbil her bill that the senate unfortunately did not take up. We look forward to putting it together. As quickly and this is so important. There was
Weve already been directed to use that model. We now have to go to the court to access the data. Is the government no longer collecting located . The data continues to be provided to us. Now to access the data we have to go to the court to get permission to access the data. Why continue to gather the data is both administration and the and i dont think this is the best approach to . Guess im confused because i dont think ive heard the president or the di said access to the data is not a value. I think what ive heard is the question gets to be who should hold the data it the president directed in his remarks will continue to implement the program right now while Congress Works to how well make longterm changes. We will do that on a 90 day interval. So every 90 days we have to go back and ask for continued permission. One last comment. I know amount of time. If the administration believes, and understand that they do, that the better model is to go to a paradigm where Companies Hold onto
Responsible for 45 emissions. Europe, 15 . Altogether, 60 emissions. It is a political commitment at the highest level. This would show the responsible leadership level 228 European Countries plus United States plus china. This is in terms of numbers. Paquette, this, i believe, china being a part of the game. This will inject a very Strong Political laments and to be part of this process. It can be more and more difficult for the countries who are other significant emitters who will not be a part of the coalition of finding a solution. It will be very difficult for them not to be part of the countries who want to find the solution. And these countries are the 28 European Countries, europe and china. Number three, i believe the key issue here is china. In europe and i believe in north america and asia, many people who find a solution to Climate Change say and will say we can do a lot of things to reduce emissions. But if china doesnt move, we cannot find a solution. So why should we pun