denied any part of the murder, and asked them a question about angie. was she raped? tell me. i don t know, if she was, we could figure it out. and low and behold, he was right. that dna result came back, and the semen on her body did not belong to ben or chris. neither one of them. what went through your heads when the dna results came back showing the attacker was not ben hobbs? if you re going to nail it down to a word, it s frustration. detectives decided that did not mean chris was lying or theory of the crime was wrong. it could only mean, they decided, they had to expand the theory. ben and chris were guilty. they were sure of it. that mystery dna had to come from a third man, third attacker, so they put chris back
the motive, revenge. supposedly angie had been meddling in ben s marriage and mr. hobbs did not like that one bit. so detectives confronted hobbs, who denied any part in fact murder. and asked them a question about angie. was she raped the night she was killed? i don t know. that s why i m asking you because if she was, my dna will prove my innocence right there. and lo and behold, he was right. that dna result came back and the semen found on angie s body didn t belong to ben hobbs or chris tapp, neither one of them. what went through your heads when the dna results came back and it showed that the attacker was not ben hobbs. it s frustration. but the detectives decided that didn t mean chris was lying or that the theory of the crime was wrong. it could only mean they decided that they needed to expand the theory. ben hobbs and chris tapp were guilt, they were sure of it, so that mystery dna must have come from a third man, a third attacker. so they put tapp back in the
kimberly olson thought the whole world had gone crazy. he s a poker player and he had made his mistakes, obviously, with the women in his life. but i mean, that s a very far jump from being a poker player to murdering your parents. but back home in north carolina, when adrian solomon heard about ernie s arrest did you believe he could have done such a thing? i believe that he could have and for me that was enough. a date was set for trial based on circumstantial evidence. even though that mystery dna at the crime scene was never identified. even though not one piece of direct evidence connected ernie to any murder weapon or those mysterious nike footprints. remember, they were consistent with a size 12 and ernie wore 9 1/2 or 10. and you knew that one of the lines that was coming had to be a defense attorney couldn t resist it was if those shoes don t fit you must acquit. absolutely. and a jury just might look at that. and that went through my mind
world had gone crazy. he s a poker player and he had made his mistakes, obviously, with the women in his life. but i mean, that s a very far jump from being a poker player to murdering your parents. but back home in north carolina, when adrian solomon heard about ernie s arrest did you believe he could have done such a thing? i believe that he could have and for me that was enough. a date was set for trial based on circumstantial evidence. even though that mystery dna at the crime scene was never identified. even though not one piece of direct evidence connected ernie to any murder weapon or those mysterious nike footprints. remember, they were consistent with a size 12 and ernie wore 9 1/2 or 10. and you knew that one of the lines that was coming had to be a defense attorney couldn t resist it was if those shoes don t fit you must acquit. absolutely. and a jury just might look at that.
he s a poker player and he had made his mistakes, obviously, with the women in his life. but i mean, that s a very far jump from being a poker player to murdering your parents. but back home in north carolina, when adrian solomon heard about ernie s arrest did you believe he could have done such a thing? i believe that he could have and for me that was enough. a date was set for trial based on circumstantial evidence. even though that mystery dna at the crime scene was never identified. even though not one piece of direct evidence connected ernie to any murder weapon or those mysterious nike footprints. remember, they were consistent with a size 12 and ernie wore 9 1/2 or 10. and you knew that one of the lines that was coming had to be a defense attorney couldn t resist it was if those shoes don t fit you must acquit. absolutely. and a jury just might look at that. and that went through my mind several times. and then someone noticed that