you re g going up against t a machine.e. it goes bebeyond dadavid and gogoliath. think k of like hahalf a davd againsnst like, twtwo times goliliath. and d this time e maybe david doesesn t have g god on his s . [m[music playiying]
[music playiying] chloe melalas: sean and natete s legal t team had a planan all alongng that they were e going to g go to tl bebecause theyey wanted toto r from taylolor swift hehersel. marina v v. bogorad:d: we willll ask for d depositions for ththe songwrititers, inclcluding taylylor swift. and thenen the juryy will b be selecteded, and thisis case willll be trien fedederal court t in los angng. marinana v. bogorarad: yes, e expect t taylor swifift to test. maririna v. bogogorad: we r re hoping i it will be. itit probably y will bebe a media c circus. maririna v. bogogorad: i didit sasay they havaven t offerere.
and-d na, na, , na, na, , na, na, nana. na, na, , na. do youou know whatat this weit is youou re about t to lift? do youou understanand the size and m magnitude o of it? i sasaid, yeah, , i get it.. but wewe don t wanant to be us. and we d don t wantt to be e appropriatated. interviewewer 25: whatat advie would yoyou give to o anyone o wants toto become a a singer? taylor s swift: get a goodod lawyer. [m[music playiying]
sure tayaylor swift t will be sg fofor copyrighght infringegem. peteter andersonon: we ve got two exextremes, whwhere it s identicacal copying g of this exact nunumber of rerepetitio, anand we ve gogot the plaiaints work whehere there s s no repetitition at allll. but i i think no r repetitiont all l means it s s not protete. i think k there s anan argumet with thihis number of repetitit, it i is protecteted. intervrviewer 2: t thank you. peter ananderson: ththank you,u, your hononor. maririna v. bogogorad: i thik thatat was also o a point tht inflfluenced thehe ninth cicircuit sayiying, yeyes, this cacase should d pr. [m[music playiying] julilian wright:t: the thing that s stood out t to me was me than jusust the wordrds. there e were quitete a few structuralal things ththat i w within thehe compositition thatat s in bothth songs. they re e both used d as the ho. a hohook is ththat s the c c. that s thehe part of t the sog that eveverybody rememembers. lilisa respersrs france: i n th
playing] interviewewer 1: playeyers go play, anand haters g gon hat, yoyou know? songwrititers nathanan butler d seanan hall sueded taylor sws, claiaiming that t taylor swift s sosong, shakeke it o borroweded from a sosong they we fofor 3lw calllled playass gon plalay . lisa r respers frarance: in 20, hallll and butleler filed a a lt agaiainst tayloror swift becee ththey felt lilike those l ls that playayers going g to playay, haters g going to hah had cocome from ththeir 200000 hit song g with 3lw.. sidndney madden:n: to someone who o says they y hear absololy no simililarity betwtween s shake it ofoff anand playas s gon play betweeeen those twtwo choruse, you would d have to bebe listeg with t three sets s of earmufs to tryry and realllly argue e with that.t. [m[music playiying] sean h hall: some e lawyers reran ththe situatioion. but i dididn t get i it becaue usually y when peoplple say copyriright infriningement, nine timimes out of f 10, they mean the music. oh, the