Nearly one month ago, i announced montana was ready to create another new normal by entering into phase one of our. Eopening the big sky plan our quick, aggressive, and early actions to close schools, bars and restaurants, then enter into a stayathome order would us in , in many waysion a starkly better position than most other states to allow us to start reopening. At the time, we had the lowest number of positive cases and hospitalizations per capita. Weapril 26, three weeks ago began the steps of a gradual reopening of montana. To this day, that still stands. Montana continues to have the lowest number of positive cases and hospitalizations per capita in the country. On aprilse one began 26, we have seen a total of 22 new cases. We continue to meet the criteria laid out by the cdc of a downward trajectory of positive tests as a percentage of total tests within a 14 day period. The virus remains contained in montana at this time, and new cases are relatively low. Virus isecognize the
Talked about four acts. There are four acts. In the first second and third already has reached a conclusion for adam schiff. Announcer we are going to leave this but you can find it online. We will take you live now to a discussion about religious freedom with officials from the Justice Department, education department, and health and Human Services. Silence cell phones please on september the 23rd, President Trump delivered an important speech on religious freedom at the united nations. He said our founders understood that no right is more fundamental to a peaceful, prosperous and Virtuous Society than the right to follow ones religious convictions. He added that too often people in positions of power preach diversity while silencing, shunning or censoring the faithful. True tolerance means respecting the right of all people to express their deeply held religious beliefs. Ow right he is during the last administration, relieved religious adherents felt besieged. While the Obama Adminis
That is the president a few moments ago. We will have live coverage of the president when he gets to and these other big separation of powers cases. They come along every few years. They sometimes can feel like the real nuts and bolts. What i like about these case is they explain why business groups and others would not bring separation of powers of they cannot get meaningful relief. Interestingose were briefs to parse through. It is going to be argued on the 15th. A lot of folks are going to argue. I am interested to see how much the court wants to focus on the employed womans and stuff versus the stuff. I think the court is going to be skeptical of what the First Circuit date on the backside. In the last couple of terms, they have been skeptical of a lot have Agency Actions that have been more willing to put the government to its paces on respecting separation of powers and checking its boxes. Said, there is a practical reality that some of these cases feel like the old winstar case
Administration. Way im the Vice President of the institute for Constitutional Government here at heritage. Silence cell phones please john on september the 23rd, President Trump delivered an important speech on religious freedom at the united nations. He said our founders understood that no right is more fundamental to a peaceful, prosperous and Virtuous Society than the right to follow ones religious convictions. He added that too often people in positions of power preach diversity while silencing, shunning or censoring the faithful. True tolerance means respecting the right of all people to express their deeply held religious beliefs. How right he is. During the last administration, religious adherents felt besieged. While the Obama Administration was prepared to honor freedom of worship, freedom of religion was another matter. Obama Administration Officials preached that tolerating religious adherence was great. For a moment, they can find their way to houses of worship and did not
My name is robert barnes. I cover the Supreme Court for the washington post. Thanks for coming on this crisp, fall day to hear about the Supreme Court. Id like to thank the federalist society, particularly the Facility Division and practice groups for putting together what we think will be an interesting panel on what looks to be a very interesting term at the Supreme Court. After the trauma of last years confirmation hearings, theres been a thought from those who watched the court that it went out of its way not to look partisan last term, to look for ways to bust up the ideological divide on the court in some cases and to slow walk some controversies to keep them off that years docket. Its been welldocumented that each of the conservative justices at least once joined the four liberals to make up a majority in a case. And it went the other way, too. Each of the liberals at least once abandoned his or her usual voting partners and joined the conservatives in a case. Harmony could be h