He can express any views he was. Wants. The big mistake was not recusing himself. When he tweeted he would make sure trump doesnt become president and has an insurance policy, he could not be fair and just. By not recusing himself, he violated his position of trust. I would not go too far and blame it on the top authorities of the fbi. They didnt know. When they did know, they demoted him and took him out of the investigation. I think its a blemish, but i dont think its a fatal flaw in the investigation. I think there are deeper and more fatal flaws. Ultimately i think it was the right decision. Tucker dont those texts suggest why he didnt recuse himself . Its one thing to express a political opinion. Do i it for a leaving. Living. He was suggesting that his opinions would drive the crimmial investigation that he was conducting. Thats subversion of justice. Thats the issue. He denied under oath that in any way he was influenced by his hatred for thump in any of his professional decisio
own soiar making it very easy to collect your own solar panels making it very easy to collect your own solar panels are making it very easy to collect your own solar panels are subsidising l own solar panels are subsidising them own solar panels are subsidising them on own solar panels are subsidising them on the own solar panels are subsidising them on the roof. own solar panels are subsidising them on the roof. a own solar panels are subsidising them on the roof. a huge - own solar panels are subsidising. them on the roof. a huge scheme own solar panels are subsidising - them on the roof. a huge scheme for solar panels them on the roof. a huge scheme for solar panels on them on the roof. a huge scheme for solar panels on balconies them on the roof. a huge scheme for solar panels on balconies for - them on the roof. a huge scheme for solar panels on balconies for peoplel solar panels on balconies for people who rent solar panels on balconies for people who rent �
upe them and uses your governmet to get special deals for you family. you call them joe biden. all right. joe s house of cards is now crumbling around him. now, this week iumbling n courtt hunter directly contradicted his father when he admitte, hund to taking money from china. now, that was something joe would vehemently denied ined one of the debates. in other words, joe got caught in.a li a lie yet once again.n. now, meanwhile, hunter s lawyers have now reportedlyrt been banned from calling the county clerk afteredly they were accused the night before the hearing of misreported, misrepresentingy we themselves on a phone call to the clerk. and according to the allegatione o s a member of biden s legal team actually pretended to represent a republican congressman in an attempndedtt o to get evidence removed fromce a recent amicu removs filing, ag that was on the court docket. but the shady behavior didn t dd stop there. look at this. this was the key sto paragraph s
it suggests they think they broke the law. the evidence against gaetz is strong. three white house aides testifying matt gates suggested a pardon. here s some of that exchange. did you hear anything in that meeting you considered unconstitutional or illegal? okay. then why after that meeting did you seek a pardon in they all testified under oath that you requested a pardon. that s misreported. from the beginning of time you will until today for any and all things. the question is, can you really say all of them are committing perjury, lying on you, a ? and b, if a pardon was requested, why not just tell us, what were you worried about? what was i you thought you or others might be indicted for? cassidy hutchinson is a known lawyer. hold on now.