presidential elections. i think the most compelling thing, though, is a very broad narrative, jose, and it s this, this report is about the danger of lies and conspiracy in our politics. the danger of manipulating voters with misinformation often done with malice, of misinforming viewers, often, knowingly and with malice. and at times, the deadly coincidences of those types of misinformation campaigns. that is at the heart of the january 6th story line and the reason it matters is we re about to embark of a chapter of oversight of the biden administration where republicans often reach for misinformation and conspiracy. when elise stefanik declares that joe biden is that could spoke the kind of violence that we saw. it s a warning to us as much as it is a capture of what actually happened.
suppression campaign, in fact smearing and demonization campaign. i would like to know what role did he play in inducing social media to suppress scientific discussion online. we know that he was in contact. there s an email of him exchanging information with mark zuckerberg, ceo of facebook, where zuckerberg offers his help. much of that email is redacted so the public can t see exactly what they wrote. i wro love to know how they spoke to each other, how dr. fauci directed underlings to enact a suppression sensorship campaign that violated the first amendment of a large number of scientists, led to misinformation, the misinforming of the american public on basic fact about covid throughout the pandemic. laura: and professor, also because you challenged lockdown
Requests Standardization Apply Equally to All to Avoid Misinforming Investors and to Improve Accuracy and Transparency
PITTSBURGH, June 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ In a letter to the U.S. Securities. | June 16, 2022
consistently mendacious. pretty much all politicians lie, but when we see people operating in bad faith and using the media as a means of misinforming people, those people should not be allowed access to platforms, particularly like the sunday morning shows, something we ve done again and again. margaret sullivan has a great point saying we should stop having reporters covering politics, instead covering government because politics is treated like sports, but covering government requires that you look at ethical questions, that you look at issues of democracy, that you look at what exactly is being done to the governing structures of the country. jonathan altar, there are three subjects in front of us. professor cobb s just distinguished between politics and government. there s a third, which is the
that we should not give platforms to people who are consistently mendacious. now, of course, i m not naive enough to think that politicians don t lie. pretty much all politicians do. but when we see people who are operating in bad faith and using the media as a means of misinforming people, those people should not be allowed access to platforms, particularly like the sunday morning shows, something that we ve done again and again. and finally, i think that, you know, margaret sullivan has a really great point when she says that we should stop having reporters consider themselves covering politics. instead have them covering government because politics is treated like sports, but covering government requires that you look at ethical questions, that you look at issues of democracy, that you look at what exactly is being done to the governing structures of the country. jonathan alter, there are three subjects in front of us.