election interference. here we are about six weeks out before the midterms. how are we looking? we re looking securely in secure. national security when you do a threat assessment you often look at at intent and capabilities. we have four adversaries that have the most advanced cybersecurity abilities in the world and john bolton says they re trying to attack us. we have gross physical and social insecurities. our infrastructure, state voting systems, cane decades-old laws. and the ceo of twitter testified under oath that he can t guarantee social media won t be manipulated again. so that puts it on the same stage at russia s covert programs. that could lead to a gross misallocation of resources when we have no time to waste. so much else going on.
a view shared by austria which is about to take over the use rotating presidency and with which germany could soon have a hard border again. but this is because i think it s important that we no longer primarily fight about the distribution of migrants within the european union. but instead focus on securing our outer borders together. but beyond beefing up the use external border security member states don t agree on much concerning migrants and even france merkel s closest european allies is warning that the bloc could potentially break apart over this issue. did have used chief political editor of misallocation or traveled with the chancellor on her trip to jordan and to lebanon she joins us in our studio now. how. sure did the chancellor see on this trip she s very good being business as usual and she s very routine
because the supreme court decision in 2012 and many states people below the poverty line are inelible for medicaid and ineligible for the tax credits. there s a misallocation of sources that has to be addressed one way or the other and instability and unfairness across the country. you can t have a system where some states have massive support towards coverage because they elected it and other states because they are fiscally conservative don t do it. it s not fair to taxpayers. all of your points make a lot of sense. do they not call you guys? you re a bunch of scholars? why doesn t the bill you made basic comments dealing with people on the low end of the income system. creating competition which we re losing in many places and reforming medicaid. why does this bill not deal with this stuff? it deals with some of them but they are living under very difficult restrictions which is they are trying to pass this with just republican votes which
pennsylvania were part of her core 270 as we saw. if she would have held them, she would have won the election. more of those diverse white coll collar sunbelt states, colorado, new mexico, nevada. she was able to hold those. i do think there was a misallocation of resources. wisconsin and michigan, they were absent in october when trump was eating away at their advantage. as you point out, that was not the sole answer. we saw a widening of all the geographic and demo graph ek devilds we have. with clinton depending on primarily white collar voters. trump s dominating among blue collar whites and voters who lived outside major cities. and that portion of america united behind trump just a little more than clinton s did behind her. one very revealing number, voters who approved of president obama, just about 80% of them, over 80% of them, voted for clinton. there was a slight waiver in the clinton in the obama
that isis was building an attack capability in europe and are focusing on buildings[ an attac capability in the united states. we know from our own f.b.i. director that are overwhelmed. so why would we add to that problem when we know that we can t vet these people. how would we do it? donald trump, when i talk about it in the next segment, possibly closing mosques, that we can show our radical leaders? would you do that? i would not do that because i think that will inflame populations.v? what i would do is absolutely increase the number of agents we have on the ground. here s a startling fact. we have more irs agents than f.b.i. and c.i.a. does that strike you as a misallocation of resources? of course it is. we need to take this terror