impacted and influenced and controlled by technology. certain parts of those digital surveys are supposed to be inaudible infrastructure, therefore governed by non profit and yet, there is so much capitalistic kind of approache to control of the commercial aspect and commercial potential of this technology. i think that openai saga was, you know the fundamental tension is really between the nonprofit mission versus full profit. of course, there is a lot of nuance between this in terms of how they governed, how the board handled this whole situation, including exactly what technical concerns that the board has seen to compel them to press the panic button. last night, overnight, ijust woke up to a lot of discussion in terms of studies we can take unpack that a little bit more but the most important thing we can ask is what kind of, you know, technology, what kind of digital service should be governed by non profit and regarded as a public service and what kind of technol
and british victory in the opening singles seemed imperative, but miomir kecmanovic was super strong and extremely consistent. he said he felt the pressure well, he thrived. britain s captain leon smith has been through all this before. draper, at 21, not so much. ranked just below his opponent, draper took kecmanovic to two tie breaks, but he lost them both. serbia celebrated as if they knew what was coming. well, here he is. novak djokovic tried to settle it. in the blue corner, cameron norrie. good luck. now, there were some british voices in the crowd trying to hurry djokovic up when he served, but when he won the first set, the gesture was aimed back at them good natu red, probably. djokovic wrapped up the match in straight sets, job done for serbia. then he went to do an on court interview, seemingly near some noisy british supporters. it wasn t broadcast at the time, it was captured on a mobile phone. djokovic suggests they learn how to respect players and behave.
against serbia jack draper was playing kecmanovic, not djokovic. british victory in the open single seemed imperative but kecmanovic was super strong and extremely consistent. said he felt the pressure but he thrived. britain s captain leon smith has been through all of this before. draper, at 21, not so much. ranked just below his opponent, draper took kecmanovic to two tie breaks but he lost them both. serbia celebrated as if they knew what was coming. well, here he is. novak djokovic tried to settle it. in the blue corner, cameron norrie. good luck. there were some british voices in the crowd trying to hurry djokovic up when he served. but when he won the first set, the gesture was aimed back at them. good natu red, probably. djokovic wrapped up the match in straight sets, job done for serbia. then he went to do an on court interview seemingly near some noisy british supporters. wasn t broadcast at the time, but was captured on a mobile phone. djokovic suggests they learn
a certain part of those digital services are supposed to be public infrastructure, they are governed by nonprofit, and yet there is so much capitalistic approach to control of the commercial aspect and commercial potential of this technology. i think that openai saga was. the fundamental tension is really between the nonprofit mission versus for profit. of course, there s a lot of nuance between those, in terms of how the board handled this whole situation, including, actually, what technical concerns that the board has seen to compel them to press the panic button. last night, overnight, ijust woke up to a lot of discussion in terms of 0 star study, and we can unpack that a little bit more, but overall i think the most important question we need to ask is, what kind of technology, what kind of digital service should be governed by nonprofit and regarded as public service and what kind of technology should be controlled by a handful of shareholders and commercial service? let
technology. certain parts of those surveys are supposed to be inaudible infrastructure and governed by non profit and yet, there is so much capitalistic kind of approaches to control of the commercial aspect and commercial potential of this technology. i think that openai saga was, you know, the fundamental tension is really between the nonprofit mission versus full profit but, of course, there is a lot of nuance between this in terms of how they govern, how the board handles this whole situation, including exactly what technical concerns that the board has seemed to compel them to press the panic button. last night overnight i woke up to a lot of discussion in terms of studies but we can take that later but the most important thing we can ask is what kind of, you know, technology, what kind of digital service should be governed by non profit and regarded as a public service and what kind of technology should be controlled by shareholders and commercial services? , sharehol