Cspan is your unfiltered view of government. Funded by these Television Companies and more including charter communications. Charter is proud to be recognized as one of the best internet providers, and we are just getting started. 100,000 miles of new infrastructure to reach those who need it most. Crter communications supports cspan as a public servant, along with these other television providers, giving you a front row seat to democracy. Up next, a group of attorneys previewed the Upcoming Supreme Court term including cases on gun rights, Consumer Protection three speech. The Pacific Legal foundation is the host of this hourlong conversation. We are going to go ahead and get started. Perfect timing. Good afternoon. Im elizabeth on behalf of Pacific Legal foundation and our partners and the foundation for individual rights. Id like to welcome you to this years Supreme Court preview discussion and also welcome to our viewers on cspan. The Court Term Begins on monday of next week. This
Including the judge, herself, or potential witnesses who may testify on in a federal criminal trials, stemming from his effort to subvert the 2020 election. Now, prosecutors said, quote, the defendants past conduct, including conduct that has taken place after and as a direct result of the indictment in this case, actually demonstrates the need for this order. Adding that trumps past salvos had already resulted in harassment of potential witnesses. Of course, to no ones surprise, yeah, donald trump responded by doing what he always does. Lashing out. This, time on social media, claiming that President Biden had weaponize the doj and the fbi. Of course, there is no evidence to support that whatsoever. And its requests, the special counsels office contends that trump hosts amount to more than a mere breach of decorum, because his public vitriol has a history of unleashing harassment by his followers. Of course, the prosecution specifically cited Donald Trumps infamous attacks on his form
Night, the special counsel jack smith asked judge Tanya Chutkan to issue a gag order against donald trump prohibiting him from attacking prosecutors. Including the judge, herself, or potential witnesses who may testify on in a federal criminal trials, stemming from his effort to subvert the 2020 election. Now, prosecutors said, quote, the defendants past conduct, including conduct that has taken place after and as a direct result of the indictment in this case, actually demonstrates the need for this order. Adding that trumps past salvos had already resulted in harassment of potential witnesses. Of course, to no ones surprise, yeah, donald trump responded by doing what he always does. Lashing out. This, time on social media, claiming that President Biden had weaponize the doj and the fbi. Of course, there is no evidence to support that whatsoever. And its requests, the special counsels office contends that trump hosts amount to more than a mere breach of decorum, because his public vit
Students from lowincome families can get the tools they need to be ready for anything. Comcast supports cspan as a Public Service along with these other Television Providers giving you a frontrow seat to democracy. , at the next minnesota democratic Governor Tim Walz touted his administrations focus and investment in education while delivering a state of the state address. He also discussed protecting Reproductive Health care rights and ivf. Rebuilding the states Water Infrastructure and responsible gun ownership. The covetous address runs just over 20 minutes. The governors address. Thank you all and good evening. Chaplin, thank youl for the beautiful words and please one round of applause for the Owatonna High School choir. Incredible. [applause] madam speaker and members of the minnesota house of representatives, that a majority leader and members of the minnesota senate, madam chief justice, distinguished members of the Minnesota Supreme Court and chief judges siegal. My fellow con
harvard s laurence tribe and the retired conservative federal judge jay michael luttig, declared that the constitution prohibits trump from ever being president again, based on section three of the 14th amendment. since then, there s been movement in court in multiple states where efforts have sprung up to enforce the 14th amendment. one case, seeking to disqualify trump was dismissed by the minnesota supreme court, but that case was specific to trump being on the primary election ballot for the republican nomination, so the argument could be brought before the court again for the general election ballot. in another case in michigan, a judge ruled that it was a non-justice-able political issue, that should be decided by congress, not by the state. just yesterday, the petitioners appeal that ruling to the michigan supreme court. but this ruling out of colorado is particularly interesting, because the opinion goes further that any of the other judges have been willing to vent