because it is being challenged and we have to accept that and respond to this challenge, which i hope we will be doing in this debate. despite the hysterical reactions of the country can i think it s important to state that this is a properly constituted senior committee of the house as indeed the leader of the house did so in her remarks. it was asked to do a difficult but vitaljob and it discharged its duties with integrity and honour will stop it is our duty now, i believe, before this house to ensure that we support the members of that committee and we support the conclusions that they have come to after this detailed work. i believe also we should thank the members of the privileges committee because they have done the house of commons a very great service under the most intense pressure. instead of being thanked, they have found themselves traduced in the borisjohnson worshiping print and tv media, which has called into question their motives and their very integrity. t
they weren t. and i take the plain meaning of his words. you don t have to investigate any further, just the plain meaning will do. he said he had repeated assurances. he didn t. he misrepresented the facts as he knew them. meanwhile, people died in isolation or lost their livelihood, we often forget that bit, or missed out on a wedding or an important moment in theirfamily out on a wedding or an important moment in their family life because they are abided by the rules and they are abided by the rules and they thought that the big truth of they thought that the big truth of the pandemic was that we were all in this together. and that s why there is for civil anger. visceral angen is for civil anger. visceral anger. i hear it often about those who think that some people didn t abide by the rules and those with the people who wrote the rules. this wasn t a single instance either. many members have said of course that happens and we have a proper process we ve had since 2007 for a