central television. it means that npfrr is not thate different from the tehran times ,with the exception, ofhappen course, being lessed accurate and more anti-american. yo so that happened on tuesday. why are we telling you. chan abt with all the momentous changes underway around the world, whyy would we open a showab with a story about twittergorizing categorizing npr as state media will ? because it s true. reaso that s the reason.n. finally, thankfully, somebodyd in authority has told the truth about something and that is thrilling to see on its own terms. in a world defined by lies froms our leaders. this seemedig like a rare sis of hope and progress. up telling the truth is the mostms revolutionary act of all, far more than taking up arms. and yet you rarely see it. human beings created language or to describe the world around them more precisely than they could with , say, grunting sign language. ng o beeurnn evly, we have national publi own creatioern ever since, b
that will determine the course of your life going forward. so weam te sendhe our team outs tonicourse of the year to find the real stories tonight. i those include the global water crisis, which is rea.l, e the rise of america s fastest growing professionalt an sports league, which you may not have heard of, and theing, vindication of prepping people made fun of it. they don t anymore. and then the stunning suppression of civil libertiesof and human rights in the nation of canada wholly ignored in this country. we begin tonight with a reportso on something that matters to everyone, to every human bein g, the food that you eat.ma and that food may be changing. , all of a sudden, the people in charge, politicians, billionaire oligarchs, celebrities are telling you yout haveelli to fight climate change by changing what you eat. they may not want to change what you eat. no one ever voted on that. it o but democracy doesn t matteroo when it comes to the food supply. here s a
,you will remember, lecturinguiy the rest of us about equity, meaning that straight white men are bad. and yet, strangelyy th, the perl he chose for this job was not ws a member of a racial or minority. guinority. privileged straight white guy.y he was called nick mcquaid. nick mcquaid went to private schools. he wrote at wesleyan. he w went to columbia for law school. he is definitely not oppressed. but that did not mattemar to joe biden. some jobs are too important for affirmative action. liquid ertives main qualificn was being the former law l partner of hunter biden aws criminal attorney in december criminal attorney in december a latham and watkins lawyer called chris clark to defend him againslaar t potential federaljust a tax charges. just a month later, hunter biden s dad hired chris clark s partner, nick mcquaid, to oversee the agency that could bring those federal tahex charges. that seems like an obviousglr and glaring conflict, buint no, nick mcquaid did not
many similar movements that arae on the way. inevitably, and the few visionaries who have grasped this obvious truth weirdly , have not been welcomed by blue am america. they have been mockeda, they and derided as prophets, always are. a fewfe years ago, foro, example, a blue blond woman from montana called rachel dolezal declared that she wanas black because she decided that she was black . blackness was rachel dolezald lived experience, but she was not greeted as liberators. t gr she was almost immediateh booed off the stage and then she disappearee d and tellingly, none of the people yelling atye rachel dolezal ever explained whdy she couldn t be black. why not?t? in this country, you can change your , but not your race. really, how does that work? what species of science are weec talking about here? it was note are we defensible al and so over time, like alle ar indefensible arguments, it will collapse someday. the new york times will give g rachel dough s all its
advertisers? anyone who do that is obviously pablo escobar level corrupt and should not be trusted. what would that look like? that level of corruption? well, imagine that the trump administration had made it mandatory for american citizens to buy mypillow. that s when fox news s biggest advertisers imagined. the administration declared that if you didn t rush out and buy at least one , mypillow and then at least another booster pillow, you may not be allowed to eat out. you couldn t reenter your own country. you couldn t have a paying job. mypillow, they told you with a straight face, was the very lynchpin of our country s public health system. now, imagine if they told you that that fox, as your news organization endorsed it, amplified the government s message. imagine if fox news attacked anyone who refused to buy mypillow as an ally of russia, as an enemy of science. and then imagine that fox kept up those libelous attacks even as evidence mounted that mypillow ca