. gregg: the hate aspect of this serves two functions, not only crimes in and of themselves, but during sentencing, hate borne of race and disability as well, mental handicap can be an aggregating factor to elevating the sentence. right, in new york, if you are charged with low level felony but deemed to be a hate crime, you ratchet up to the next sentencing level, and the fact that s taeb into consideration in this case in chicago, the judge is going to consider it, the probation department will consider it. they re facing a much stiffer sentence than normal. gregg: aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. unlawful restraint. aggravated again. you look at some of the things and it s only one year two, years, i looked up the statutes. that s not enough for something like that. that s why the enhanced penalty will come from the hate crime factor, because that is, when something is motivated by
but isn t it, scottie, a reflection of what the law is? roe v. wade is a complex decision, it s not as simple as we often make it but their decision the the the essence of it is you have to take the women s the woman s choice and the woman s health into consideration no matter what stage it is that the state is going to decide to regulate. do you believe that a woman doesn t have a right to decide what happens to their own body? well, outside of the case of rape or incest or obviously the woman s life is in that still makes you pro-life if her life is at risk. hillary clinton yesterday tried to muddy the water saying a woman s life might be at risk, a mother s life might be at risk. that s still pro-life. we re not talking about those those situations. that s a different we re talking about women who have started to use this as a version of birth control who have had multiple abortions who sit there and decide they find out a genetic test that their child might have som
authorities or to the atf or the fbi that they just saw a patient that would harm the general public or themselves if they were to buy a weapon. so it s a failure of the health care system to not be able to report because they re too you know, the hippa privacy is too shielded and guarded information. but yet we re enabling these people with some type of a mental handicap to go out and buy a weapon and use it on themself or others. they re and, of course, it comes at a time when it comes at a time when the majority of americans seem quite happy that the nsa can access almost all their private data. so you have a complete hypocrisy here the ones who shout loudest about we can t infringe the second amendment in terms of background checks because of the
so it s a failure of the health care system to not be able to report because they re too you know, the hippa privacy is too shielded and guarded information. but yet we re enabling these people with some type of a mental handicap to go out and buy a weapon and use it on themself or others. they re and, of course, it comes at a time when it comes at a time when the majority of americans seem quite happy that the nsa can access almost all their private data. so you have a complete hypocrisy here the ones who shout loudest about we can t infringe the second amendment in terms of background checks because of the information it may unveil. they re the ones saying, nsa should carry on doing what they re doing.
so it s a failure of the health care system to not be able to report because they re too you know, the hippa privacy is too shielded and guarded information. but yet we re enabling these people with some type of a mental handicap to go out and buy a weapon and use it on themself or others. they re and, of course, it comes at a time when it comes at a time when the majority of americans seem quite happy that the nsa can access almost all their private data. so you have a complete hypocrisy here the ones who shout loudest about we can t infringe the second amendment in terms of background checks because of the information it may unveil.