investigation into the trump transition team. this is one of the things that has a memory hold. but remember jared kushner had to refile his ethics disclosure over 30 times. it s unclear if he ever got top level clearance. but the washington post reported he was granted top seeberate status, one that dudoes not allow him to 12450e most closely guarded intelligence. and rob porter. he was the gentleman accused of violence by both of his exwives the white house knew that about him and was warned by the fbi and kept him in there without a clearance doing his job. and don t forget president trump s personal assistant. he was fired after more than a year on the job when tan investigation found he was a frequent gambler mp elijah cummings has requested the nra send everything it has on
if you are the powerful white privileged schoolchild. it, in fact, maybe is sort of invisible how much suffering is occurring as a result of organizations like the citizens council. how do you i realize this is not something that is new. as you say, this is something that has to get fought over constantly. sometimes it s won and sometimes lost but the struggle never stops. how do you prevent a memory hold about something like deep south segregation when i think the right wants a fight over it? how do you avoid historical fact become another contested fact becoming another he said/she said debate about it? it s weird they want a fight. it would be easy enough, particularly as republicans, to say, that s a time in our past. by the way, that was the democratic party that was behaving that way. i mean, that is bad history, but it s pretty palatable.
it, in fact, maybe is sort of invisible how much suffering is occurring as a result of organizations like the citizens council. how do you i realize this is not something that is new. as you say, this is something that has to get fought over constantly. sometimes it s won and sometimes lost but the struggle never stops. how do you prevent a memory hold about something like deep south segregation when i think the right wants a fight over it? how do you avoid historical fact becoming another contested fact becoming another he said/she said debate about it? it s weird they want a fight. it would be easy enough, particularly as republicans, to say, that s a time in our past. by the way, that was the democratic party that was behaving that way. i mean, that is bad history, but it s pretty palatable. to instead want to recover, revive and tell us that this