prevailing law. federal officials, president is the president. to establish specificity and memorialization for future handling, but extent of a president s legal authority to declass materials, without those formalities has yet to be challenged in court, we have a rogue prosecutor and rogue attorney general said we ll challenge it in court, we re indicting you. is that the way, ladies and gentlemen we re supposed to figure it out, even if you believe there some conflict or confusion, i don t think so. that is not the way it works. what about this issue of obstruction?
prevailing law. federal officials, president is the president. to establish specificity and memorialization for future handling, but extent of a president s legal authority to declass materials, without those formalities has yet to be challenged in court, we have a rogue prosecutor and rogue attorney general said we ll challenge it in court, we re indicting you. is that the way, ladies and gentlemen we re supposed to figure it out, even if you believe there some conflict or confusion, i don t think so. that is not the way it works. what about this issue of obstruction?
prevailing law. federal officials, president is the president. to establish specificity and memorialization for future handling, but extent of a president s legal authority to declass materials, without those formalities has yet to be challenged in court, we have a rogue prosecutor and rogue attorney general said we ll challenge it in court, we re indicting you. is that the way, ladies and gentlemen we re supposed to figure it out, even if you believe there some conflict or confusion, i don t think so. that is not the way it works. what about this issue of obstruction?
from a credible long-term source and they documented it within this fd 1023 and just filed it away as opposed to doing a preliminary investigation or even a full investigation at that point. and they were able to sort of cover their butts with the memorialization and say there is a record of it at some point but just whistle past the graveyard with that information and hope it never came to light. in fact this brave whistleblower who came forward to congressman comer and said it does exist has done great service to the country. brian: you know what would have happened if this was donald trump, it would have been leaked to five or six or seven major news organizations would have come outer and tried to verify it through every source possible and we would have had an ongoing investigation over an oalleged corruption with donald trump. would is i it so driven different? well, you just need to look at recent evidence of how the fbi has behaved itself. when it comes to looking at pro-li
since the obama administration. our next guest is a former fbi agent who testified about the alleged abuses within the bureau. steve friend joins us right now. steve, this is a so-called 1023. christopher wray wouldn t admit he had it. then he says you can t see it. then he says can you come to the fbi and see it. we are going to hold you in contempt. all right. i will come to you. so what is james comer going to see today? well, good morning and thank you. it seems like he is going to have the opportunity to view this source reporting document, which is essentially a memorialization of a meeting between an fbi agent and a confidential human source or an informant. and from what we have seen in the reporting, it s going to pertain to alleged bribery on behalf of joe biden when he was vice president of the united states. brian: jamie say this ranking member, no one has verified.