language. he clear ly recognized that he has a role to play in uniting and healing the country. and unfortunately, he threw some gasoline on the embers. obviously i don t see that as an appropriate comment. i think what we re trying to do here is improve the tone, the civility of the debate. and this obviously doesn t help do that. it doesn t. but you are big on social media. i m sure you saw some of the same stuff i saw on twitter, on facebook. if i had to put a percentage on it, i would say three quarters of trump supporters attacked me and supported the tweets from the president. is that what you re seeing from trump supporters? i would say yes. from some of his pro-trump activists in the media saying, hey, joe and mika are not innocent. that was the sean hannity line after this. joe and mika have been attacking the president, and this is inappropriate. we need to remind ourselves, there s this two wrongs don t
our first amendment rights. brian: the people that were against that protest were against in support of honor killing? in support of disrespect guys? do you know what these people actually subscribe to with sharia law. of course, if they really understood what sharia law do to people they wouldn t be out there counter protesting. brian: embarrassed for them. pete: should be. ainsley: why are the media saying. this they are anti-islam. they are anti-sharia law. pete: dip your toe into the water anti-muslim. when you talk to these people they know what they re protesting against. it s not islam. obey the constitution not a separate set of laws. steve: welcome back. fox & friends weekend. brian: i guess he was there. steve: spent a lot of time with him. brian: again, i will take your word to it. steve: jillian has the headlines. jillian: good morning, pete, good morning to you at home. man freed after 17 years in prison thanks to a suspect
talking while it was going. the media saying, it s one side and it s ours. i have a question for george step on all of us, here would be the question, if you don t have to pay attention to things that you don t think are the reality as you see them, why should we the rest of the american people pay attention to the things that you say that are clearly divorced from reality. george stepanoolous. he was a democratic operative and worked in the clinton white house and was part of the clinton machine that got him elected president and for him to pretend that he s totally removed and utterly objective is absurd. ii don t understand how they can pretend that they have a lock on the truth and the rest of us are ignorant. i think that s why the media s ratings are in the toilet and i
ways to, and they could do this in editing or construct a narrative where you have two or three sympathetic kark characted then immediately asked to empathi empathize. there s a real world season, i think, i don t like anybody. since the election, we ve seen the rise of media saying, let s cover professional raci s racists. see what they have to say. we see a lot of dick spencer, who was the other man? torrey whatever and then on trevor noah. this is disgusting and i want media in general to stop the an t thropological look at it. this is disgusting. we don t need to give them this light at all. i don t want to hear anymore interviews with dick spencer at all. we re going to stay on learning. learning his lesson. a viral video of cee lo
when i m congressman chris collins. the president-elect didn t say, look, when protests go too far and they re riots, he didn t say that. he said these protests are professional. we have no proof of that. i was out in the ones in new york the other night and there were a bunch of kids out there and basically people who were angry about this. which is not unusual. donald trump, as you might remember in 2012 called for the exact same thing. a protest. a march on washington to protest the travesty of mitt romney losing and then he blames the media saying, we re inciting this. is that what we need from the president-elect, in your opinion? i m not really going to express an opinion here, chris, because i don t know the circumstances. but, you know, i ll go back to the first amendment and gives thus right to gather in peaceful protests actually do send the message. violent protests, otherwise. yeah, i agree with you.